League of MN Cities Information Services

Home Browse Search

Ms. Ruth White • August 17, 1979 Page 5 residents of the city as is feasible, is ambiguous and could also cause bonding problems. It would be better to accomplish this objective by some method of certain compliance, such as posting in definite places, or publication if cost is not a major consideration for the commission. The last sentence of this subdivision provides that the poll and distribution of results isn't necessary where financing is undertaken pursuant to an emergency ordinance under Section 3.06. However, your provision on emergency ordinances provides that an emergency ordinance shall remain in effect for the duration of the emergency and shall become void when the emergency no longer exists. This could be construed to mean that the authority for issuing the debt or obligation also terminates with the end of the emergency and such a contingency could also make the bonds, notes or other obligations unsalable and thus this shortcut pro- cedure unusable. • Section 7.12 • The preceeding comment relates as well to the last sentence of this section. In subdivision 2 there is a requirement that the city make a full report to the residents of the city as soon after issuance of emergency debt certificates as is feasible. Thetype of report or means of conveyance is not specified.. While for most purposes specificity in the charter is unnecessary and binding, in the area of bond issuance, specificity may avoid problems. - Section 9.01 The last sentence of this section provides for essentially the same kind of public hearing process for property acquisition as is required under earlier sections for creation of the budget and issuance of obligations. In my judgement, this is attempting to take public involvement a bit too far. Firstly, the application of the section is not limited to real property. Thus, this section appears to require such a hearing before purchase of a police car, a desk or a light bulb. Secondly, even if the application of this section were restricted to purchases of real property, the advisability of such a provision is questionable. Certainly, purchases of great significance will have had to be anticipated in the city budget or will require bonding to secure the funds. The public input and reaction can be obtained through your hearings provision in other sections. Where minor easements and fee purchases are acquired by negotiation, the existence of a provision such as this will sub- stantially increase the expense of acquisition and delay action unduly. Moreover, to provide for such an unusually large number of public hearings can only result in - a discouragement of the electors from meaningful attendance and participation. The principle is exemplified by the story of the boy who kept crying wolf. Section 10.01 In the last sentence of this section the term "clerk" is used whenn"clerk-admini- strator" is used in most of the other sections of the charter. Section 11.06 This section spells out a specific notice requirement for public hearings required