My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-1983
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
1978-1989
>
1983
>
Minutes
>
03-09-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2018 9:07:03 AM
Creation date
8/27/2018 9:07:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Misc Documentation
Date
3/9/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOUNDS VIEW CHARTER COMMISSION MINUTES OF 3/9/83 - (CONT'D) PAGE (2) <br /> V. RESEARCH REPORTS - - REFERENCE ITEM VI. - - MINUTES OF 12/8/82 <br /> 1. JEAN MILLER = (COPY ATTACHED) <br /> 2. BILL DOTY - (COPY ATTACHED) <br /> 3. BILL DOTY ALSO REPORTED ON THE QUESTION: <br /> "DOES THE CHARTER COMMISSION HAVE THE RIGHT TO RECOMMEND REPLACEMENTS ON <br /> THE COMMISSION WHEN A VACANCY OCCURS?" <br /> HE STATED: IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA STATUTE 410.05, SUBD. 3, "A CITY <br /> COUNCIL, A CHARTER COMMISSION, OR THE PETITIONERS REQUESTING THE APPOINTMENT <br /> OF A CHARTER COMMISSION MAY SUBMIT TO THE COURT NAMES OF ELIGIBLE NOMINEES <br /> WHICH THE DISTRICT COURT MAY CONSIDER. IN MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO THE CHARTER <br /> COMMISSION." <br /> 4 NEIL LOEDING ADDRESSED THE ISSUE OF "SECTION 5.08, RECALL" IN THE CITY <br /> CHARTER, WHETHER THIS SECTION IN THE CHARTER SHOULD BE AMENDED TO ADD <br /> THE WORDS, "IF A MAJORITY OF THE ELECTORS VOTING THEREON VOTES TO RECALL <br /> THE OFFICER, HE-SHE SHALL BE RECALLED FROM OFFICE." <br /> NEIL REPORTED THAT THIS QUESTION WAS CONSIDERED BY THE CHARTER COMMISSION <br /> ON JANUARY 2, 1980, (COPY OF MINUTES ATTACHED); AT THAT TIME THE COMMISSION <br /> DID NOT FEEL IT WAS CRITICAL THAT THIS SECTION BE AMENDED WITH THE NEW <br /> SENTENCE ADDED, AS THEY FELT A "RECALL ELECTION" WOULD BE CONSIDERED A <br /> "SPECIAL CITY ELECTION", AND THUS, ACCORDING TO MINNESOTA STATUTE 205. 10, <br /> SPECIAL CITY ELECTIONS, SUBD. 1, QUESTIONS, "NO QUESTION SO SUBMITTED SHALL <br /> BE DEEMED CARRIED WITHOUT SUCH A MAJORITY IN ITS FAVOR AS MAY BE REQUIRED <br /> BY LAW OR CHARTER IN THE PARTICULAR INSTANCE." <br /> NE-IL SUGGESTED-THAT THE COMMISSION-MAY--WANT TO CONSIDER-THE-ISSUE-AGAIN-A-T <br /> SOME FUTURE DATE WHEN OTHER "COSMETIC" CHANGES MAY BE DEEMED DESIRABLE; THAT <br /> SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE ACCUMULATED, AND ALL GIVEN CONSIDERATION AT <br /> THE SAME TIME. <br /> (END OF REPORT) <br /> THE CHAIRMAN SAID HE WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION BY ANYONE CONCERNING THE <br /> SUBJECT. <br /> THERE BEING NONE, A MOTION WAS MADE BY D. MC CARTY, SECONDED BY D. HODGES, <br /> THAT THE REPORTS OF MILLER, DOTY AND LOEDING BE ACCEPTED. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.