My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-03-2012
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
10-03-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 5:56:13 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 5:56:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission October 3, 2012 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />Mr. Meyer commented there was 11 feet from the front of the garage to the side of the house, in <br />addition to the 10 -foot driveway. It was his opinion this was enough space to allow for a car to <br />maneuver out of the garage without driving on the neighboring property. He commented the <br />snow removal could be a hassle, but not much different than it has been in the past. <br />Commissioner Cramblit did not feel the snow removal was a concern, as the new homeowner <br />would have to work through these issues. He suggested a retaining wall or some sort of barrier <br />be placed between the two properties to assure the neighbor's fence was not hit. <br />Commissioner Miller asked why this lot was narrower than the surrounding properties. <br />Mrs. Mahlum explained the lot used to have a detached garage for the home she lives in next <br />door, but was split off and sold. <br />Mr. Mahlum suggested the existing garage be replaced or resided as it was in tough condition. <br />This would assure the structure matched the new home more closely. <br />Commissioner Meehlhause asked for the minimum driveway width standards. <br />Associate Heller stated the City did not have a minimum driveway width. <br />Commissioner Meehlhause questioned if the Commission could consider an eight -foot driveway <br />instead of the 10 foot width. <br />Mr. Meyer indicated this may be an option, however, with snow in the winter months, the extra <br />width would be essential. He did not want the new owner to have concerns entering and exiting <br />the property. He stated the new driveway would also align with the current curb cut. <br />Chair Stevenson did not object to having a 4 -foot setback from the south lot line in the front <br />yard. <br />Mr. Meyer reviewed the lot layout saying he was hoping to save an existing maple tree. He <br />stated if the retaining wall was to remain in place, he would have to cut into the bank supporting <br />the tree. <br />Commissioner Meehlhause suggested the applicant consider a nine -foot driveway width as a <br />compromise. <br />Commissioner Cramblit and Chair Stevenson agreed with this recommendation. <br />Chair Stevenson stated he would be in favor of the driveway being no closer than three feet to <br />the property line, which would allow for a two -foot variance. <br />Commissioner Cramblit agreed with this suggestion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.