07-05-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission July 5, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 3 ________________________________________________________________________ entering the home with the small front step and entry has proven to be very difficult. In the winter, ice buildup is also a problem. Planning Associate Heller reminded the Commission that for a variance to be approved, the applicant must demonstrate a hardship or practical difficulty associated with the property that makes a literal interpretation of the Code overly burdensome or restrictive. Planning Associate Heller reported the subject property is a typical rectangular shaped lot with no unusual characteristics or conditions. The only extraordinary condition on the property is the prevailing setback of 52 feet, 22 feet more than what would otherwise be required. Planning Associate Heller explained the literal interpretation of the provision of the Zoning Code would not deprive the applicant of rights enjoyed by other properties in the same zone, in that most homes in Mounds View maintain consistent setbacks, whether at 30 feet or 52 feet. Because of this, porch additions or any additions to the front of a home are usually problematic. Planning Associate Heller stated the Okoro’s home was constructed in 1970 and situated on the lot to be of a similar front setback as the home constructed in 1940 located on the opposite end of the block. The homes on this block all have much larger front setbacks than the 30-foot minimum, but they are all set back a similar distance from each other which effectively eliminates the possibility of a front expansion. Planning Associate Heller confirmed granting the variance would not confer upon the property owner a special privilege denied to others in the same district in that the Commission has granted front setback variances for additions in the past. Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that a ten-foot front entry and a four-foot porch that encroaches nine feet into the front setback would be the minimum variance necessary to alleviate the Okoros perceived hardship. Planning Associate Heller stated the variance would not be detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to the adjoining properties. Given how far back from the street the homes on this block are, a nine- foot encroachment may not be overly discernable or disruptive to the setback pattern for the block. Planning Associate Heller stated the proposed front entry and porch would not impair adequate light or air to adjacent properties, increase congestion of the public streets, increase the danger of fire, or endanger public safety. She also indicated property values would not be substantially diminished or impaired within the neighborhood. Planning Assistant Heller reported notices of the public hearing were mailed and submitted to the newspaper. Staff received no comments regarding this property. Commissioner Miller asked what the front setbacks were on the other side of the street. Planning Associate Heller indicated when determining a setback Staff only looks at one side of the street. She commented that the opposite side of the street is similar.