My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-18-2005
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
05-18-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 6:31:52 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 6:31:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission May 18, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda <br /> <br />None. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />5. Planning Case PD2005-001. Review and Consideration of the General Concept Plan <br />for a Proposed Residential Planned Unit Development at 2901 and 2925 County <br />Road 10. Applicant: Integra Homes <br /> <br />Planner Prososki reported that Ron Lillestrand, representing Integra Homes, originally requested <br />City approval of a general concept plan to construct twenty-one townhouse units at 2901 and <br />2925 County Road 10. She stated that the request was brought before the Planning Commission <br />during a public hearing at the May 4, 2005 meeting. She indicated that after reviewing the <br />general concept plan and taking testimony from the applicant and the surrounding property <br />owners, the Planning Commission expressed disapproval of the general concept plan for the <br />townhouse development. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki explained that the applicant stated that he would attempt to look at alternative <br />plans. She indicated the applicant is now requesting that action be tabled on this item in order to <br />provide additional time to look at alternative development concepts. She stated that should the <br />Planning Commission choose to take action now, Staff has drafted a resolution recommending <br />denial of the general concept plan, which would be forwarded to the City Council. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson commented that since the applicant did not pull their application the Planning <br />Commission is charged with either denying the request or tabling the case and allowing the <br />applicant to make changes as he sees fit. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn stated he would vote to table the request. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch agreed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked if the case would have to start over if it were denied. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki stated on general concept plans there is more flexibility. She indicated the <br />Planning Commission can table this and allow the applicant to come in with something else. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked if the applicant would have to pay another application fee. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki indicated there would not be an additional fee. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked if they were under the 60-day time limit. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki stated Staff would write a letter requesting an additional 60 days so the <br />proposal is not automatically approved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.