Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission October 6, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda <br /> <br />None. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />5. Consideration of Resolution 772-04 Granting Final Approval for an Administrative <br />Variance for a Twenty-Five Foot Rear Setback at 7717 Long Lake Road. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki indicated the applicant is proposing to construct a single-family home that <br />would serve six adults with developmental and physical disabilities. The home would be located <br />at 7717 Long Lake Road. The Mounds View Zoning Code requires a thirty (30) foot rear <br />setback and the requested setback is for a twenty-five (25) foot rear setback. This property was <br />granted a front setback variance by the Planning Commission on April 21, 2004. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki indicated that the Community Development Director has granted temporary <br />administrative variance approval and there have been no negative comments from the adjacent <br />neighbors. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Miller. To Approve Resolution 772-04, a Resolution <br />Approving an Administrative Variance to Allow for a Twenty-Five Foot Rear Setback for a New <br />House at 7717 Long Lake Road. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 1(Zwirn) Motion carried. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn indicated he had voted no on the first variance because he knew that more <br />variances would be required and he voted no on this one to be consistent. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />6. Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit Request for “The Station” at 2280 <br />County Road I <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated the applicants have requested an expansion <br />of the current use as a gas station to add two fuel pumps to the site. He then said that there are <br />some issues relating to the property as it is nonconforming. Those nonconformities are that the <br />property line splits the building in half, the property is zoned B-2 and gas stations are not <br />allowed under B-2 zoning, and there is no CUP associated with this location. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that there is no CUP for this location and there are certain <br />requirements of a CUP that cannot be met, such as the size of the lot. <br />