My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-05-2003
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
03-05-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 6:45:15 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 6:45:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission March 5, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />thoughts on the pawnshop ordinance and said that Staff hoped to have a draft ordinance before <br />the Commission to review at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked if a six-month moratorium was approved. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that it was an 8 or 9 month moratorium or until such time as the <br />ordinance is completed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked what related establishments would be. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that check-cashing facilities are a similar type of operation and the <br />City should discuss adding them to the ordinance. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that many communities have a setback requirement to say how far <br />apart the usages have to be and whether a separation from churches, schools and day care <br />facilities is required. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated there has been no official application to locate the pawnshop but the <br />potential business owner is interested in working with the City during the process of amending <br />the Code. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked what the time frame was. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated the Commission could take as many meetings as necessary to discuss <br />and review the information before making a recommendation to Council. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked what the large numbers listed in some of the sample ordinances <br />were for. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that the numbers were annual license fees and they are that large <br />because the City has a lot of responsibility and additional work when a pawnshop locates in town <br />and the fees go toward offsetting those costs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked what safeguards are there that the items are not stolen. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated there are safeguards when merchandise is pawned. He then said that <br />most communities require substantial identification of the person doing the pawning such as a <br />photograph and/or a thumbprint. The pawnshop also cannot accept goods from persons under 18 <br />and there is often a 30-day waiting period after the item is pawned to allow for the items to be <br />entered into the computerized system and checked against reports of stolen goods. He further <br />commented that the computerized system of entering pawned items makes police work much <br />easier as they simply need to check the computer rather than call numerous pawnshops. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland asked what the cost for membership would be. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.