Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Hiye indicated that it seems to be a quality structure but he is surprised that the garage was <br />built in the back. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson indicated that the structure in the back is a shed and it will not house cars. <br /> <br />Torri Johnson of 7730 Long Lake Road indicated she was concerned that the structure meets the <br />City’s Codes as well as aesthetics but has decided that the difference in setbacks provides <br />character to the neighborhood. She then said her only real concern is that there is a safety issue <br />since the structure is forward of the others and blocks the line of sight down the street. She also <br />expressed concern for the underground utilities, especially the pipeline, and asked Staff to look <br />into whether there are any special setback requirements from the pipeline. <br /> <br />Director Ericson agreed to look into any potential issues with the pipeline. <br /> <br />Mr. Zinser indicated that someone from Lot 2 had been given information from the City that the <br />setback is 30 feet. He then said that a 40-foot setback for that lot would dramatically affect the <br />size of the house on the corner lot. He further commented that they want to work with the <br />neighbors and comply with City requests but this error would be too costly to rectify as there are <br />12-inch thick concrete walls. <br /> <br />Scott Davis indicated this was a very unfortunate situation and told the neighbors he had hoped <br />to meet them under less ominous circumstances and in no way wants to alienate them. He then <br />said that he and his wife are willing to assume the costs of enlarging the living space in order to <br />resolve the oversize garage issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Davis explained that the reason the shed is in the back is because he is a carpenter and has a <br />lot of woodworking equipment and the shed was to provide a woodworking shop for him. He <br />further indicated that the house is located where it is in an attempt to keep the neighbors from <br />looking at the back half of his house instead of grass and trees but he would have been willing to <br />move it back had he known about the setback. <br /> <br />Mr. Davis indicated he appreciated the safety concern of the neighbors but said that before the <br />trees were taken out for construction you could not see down the street. <br /> <br />The Commission asked Staff to look into the pipeline issue. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn commented that if this variance came before the Commission prior to <br />construction there is no way it would be approved and he does not feel it is proper to approve <br />this after the fact. He then said that it is unfortunate that the City made a mistake but the <br />structure is very imposing and there is an opportunity to rectify the situation rather than <br />modifying the rules to allow it to continue. He further commented that this home affects what <br />happens on Lots 2 and 3. <br />