My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-02-2003
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
04-02-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 6:45:50 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 6:45:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />commented that the error was made, the building is already there, the costs to move it back are <br />cost prohibitive, and he feels the Commission needs to consider allowing the variance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland said he did not feel it would be appropriate to monetarily penalize the <br />developer and homeowner for an error by the City and he feels that as long as the homeowner is <br />willing to assume the costs for adding additional living space so that the Commission is not <br />being asked for a variance for extra garage space he would have no problem approving the <br />setback variance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson commented that the Commission has given variances for new houses in <br />existing neighborhoods on lots that would have been too small for building on. <br /> <br />One of the neighbors indicated that the home is more noticeable and sticks forward of the other <br />homes but he does not feel the homeowner or developer should have to pay that high a price to <br />move it. He then said he is not opposed to the variance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller commented that the Commission is not to consider economics when <br />determining hardship. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that economics alone should not be the sole consideration. <br /> <br />One of the neighbors indicated that granting this variance means that a variance would be needed <br />for Lot 2. <br /> <br />Mr. Zinser indicated he wanted to work with the neighbors and then said that moving the home <br />back on Lot 2 would mean that the house on Lot 3, the corner lot, would be only 24 feet wide but <br />he has plans to construct it at that size and will need to wait to see how things progress to see <br />whether he needs to come before the Commission for a variance or not. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked Staff to read the Resolution. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn commented that this is Lot 1 and there is the potential that Mr. Zinser <br />would be asking the City for consideration on Lots 2 and 3. <br /> <br />Mr. Zinser said the possibility exists but he is planning a 24 feet wide house on Lot 3 at this time <br />and cannot say definitively whether he would be before the Commission on one or both of the <br />lots for a variance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn commented that this would come before the Commission two more times. <br />He then said he would like Staff to review the surveys. <br /> <br />Director Ericson read the now therefore sections of the Resolution. He then commented that <br />Staff received the surveys for both Lots 1 and 2 at the same time and Lot 2 shows a setback of 41 <br />feet but Lot 1 shows 30 feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.