My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-16-2003
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
07-16-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 6:47:38 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 6:47:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission July 16, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that back in 1996 the City went through a similar process for adult <br />uses and that was included in the Staff report. He then said that seven years later the City has not <br />had any requests for adult uses and that may be because of the strict licensing requirements and it <br />may make it easier to locate here if the overlay district comes in. He further commented that he <br />is concerned with what might happen if a red light district is created but perhaps others do not <br />mind that. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson indicated he did not feel it made sense to lump in adult uses when those are <br />already addressed in the Code. He then said he would like to leave that out and address where to <br />zone or where an overlay district for a pawnshop should be located. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson indicated the only way he would want to lump adult uses into the overlay <br />district is if it made things more restrictive than the current Code. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that the owner of the proposed pawnshop is opposed to an overlay <br />district but he has received no update from him on the pawnshop. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked whether there was a legal reason to tie the adult uses to the <br />pawnshop discussion. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that a Council Member had asked that the Planning Commission <br />consider adult uses that may not be acceptable to the average resident at the same time as the <br />pawnshops are being discussed. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson commented that at one meeting the Commission restricted the space to allow a <br />pawnshop to 4,000 square feet and now the City is talking about an area that is several acres. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland indicated that the City could no longer limit it to one pawnshop with that <br />large area. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that Mounds View Square is approximately seven acres and the both <br />overlay districts are much larger. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated he would draft a recommendation for the Council separating out adult <br />uses from the pawnshop and take a second look at the proposed overlay district and scale it back <br />to something that is reasonable but not overly permissible for how much space there is. He also <br />said he would get feedback from the City Attorney. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch said that she feels 4,000 square feet is too much and she would prefer to <br />restrict it to 2000 or even 1000 square feet and not worry about the overlay districts. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that Council is opposed to the location in Mounds View Square <br />regardless of the size so the Commission needs to determine an overlay location. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.