Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission November 19, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda <br /> <br />None. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />5. Public Hearing and Discussion to Review the Proposed Longview Estates <br />Preliminary Plat. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated this matter is a continued public hearing for <br />Longview Estates. He then briefly reviewed the proposed plan indicating that there would be 15 <br />lots, eight on Longview Drive and seven on Silver Lake Road. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that the minimum size requirements for a subdivision in a wetland <br />zoning district are met with the proposed plan. He then said that half of the property is wetland <br />and pointed out on the map provided the areas to be filled and recreated. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated this request has not gone before Rice Creek Watershed District but he <br />included the report from Rice Creek on the previous proposed subdivision which was for 11 lots. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated there are issues with regard to the property raised by residents at the <br />first public hearing and those issues concern the hydrology of the area, alteration of the wetland, <br />the water table, and proposed impact to surrounding properties if the wetland is built on. He then <br />said that Rice Creek Watershed District and Council would review and would need to authorize <br />any development or wetland alteration permit. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that the applicant has stated that the proposed mitigation plan satisfies <br />Rice Creek Watershed District criteria but a permit has not been submitted to them. He then said <br />that Staff recommends that Mr. Harstad apply for a wetland permit from Rice Creek when this <br />request moves to Council. He further commented that the City has the authority to approve or <br />deny any alteration of any wetland so this has to go before Council with regard to the subdivision <br />and the wetland alteration. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that all the concerns raised by residents would need to be addressed as <br />well as the issue of the suitability of the soil for constructing homes. He then said that the City <br />would need engineering reports to ensure that homes can be built there without causing issues for <br />the newly constructed homes or the existing homes. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated the City received a letter after the last meeting from a resident and <br />that letter was included with the report. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that the Comprehensive Plan does designate this area as low density <br />residential and the City anticipated the area having homes on it 30 years ago when the utilities <br />were stubbed to the property. He then said that the utility stubs do not guarantee anything, <br />however. <br />