My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-2002
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
01-16-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 6:51:19 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 6:51:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission January 16, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />table the request until after the Commission discusses the Code or deny the variance because it <br />does not meet the hardship requirements. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked if it would be more appropriate to deny the variance and then discuss <br />the Code. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated it would be appropriate to deny the variance but noted that tabling the <br />request until after the Code amendment was discussed would be appropriate as well. He then <br />noted that Council may not agree with the Commission’s proposed change to the Code and, if the <br />variance was denied, the applicant would be stuck. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that variance requests, if approved, stop with the Planning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Miller/Hegland. To Table Mr. Winiecki’s Variance Request To Allow <br />Time for Review of the City’s Code. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 6 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />5. Planning Case No. VR01-012 <br /> <br />Planner Atkinson explained that William Bell of Mounds View Hotels had requested approval of <br />a variance to increase the sign height for an existing 50 foot tall pylon sign at the Days Inn. He <br />then noted that at the last meeting, the Commission had asked for more information concerning <br />line of sight comparisons to the McDonald’s and Amoco signs. <br /> <br />Planner Atkinson presented a PowerPoint presentation showing pictures of the Days Inn, <br />McDonald’s and Amoco signs from various locations. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller commented that with leaves on the trees none of the signs are visible <br />northbound on 35W. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked the height of the Amoco sign. <br /> <br />Planner Atkinson indicated that Mr. Bell had the Amoco sign measured. He then asked Mr. Bell <br />to explain how it was done. <br /> <br />Mr. Bell explained that he hired Topline Sign Company and they came out with a boom truck <br />and dropped a tape measure down to see how tall it was. He then noted that the sign was 83 feet <br />high. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller thanked Staff for the pictures and said the pictures provided a good <br />perspective. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.