My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-2002
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
06-19-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 7:31:02 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 7:30:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission June 19, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson reviewed the request of the applicant for a rezone of <br />66 lots within the Red Oak Estates No. 3 Subdivision from R-1 single-family residential to R-3 <br />medium density residential. He then indicated that the first meeting concerning this matter took <br />place on June 5, 2002 and there was considerable resident input. He further indicated that of <br />those residents speaking out against the rezoning the main concern was for flooding in the area <br />due to already existing water issues that they did not want to have made any worse. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that Staff feels that the introduction of <br />townhomes along Greenwood Drive would not be appropriate because it is a single-family <br />residential neighborhood. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that the Planning Commission is an <br />advisory body to Council and noted the Commission is charged with making a recommendation <br />based on information provided by Staff, the applicant, and input from the community. He then <br />said it is a difficult task and noted the City Council, on numerous occasions, has said they are <br />appreciative of the work the Commission does. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that with rezoning requests two things are <br />to be looked at. The first is to review the Comprehensive Plan and determine whether or not the <br />request is consistent with the Plan. The Second is to look at the potential adverse effects on the <br />neighborhood and determine whether the use will fit where it is intended. He then said that the <br />tricky part is to allow for development that does not negatively impact the surrounding <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that the property in question has always <br />been zoned R-1 and there was never any rezoning. He then noted that townhomes were allowed <br />previously in an R-1 district with a special use permit but the Code was changed and that is no <br />longer the case. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that, at the last meeting, Staff had indicated <br />that they felt an R-3 designation on the lots fronting H2 would not be inconsistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan. And, given the high density residential across the street, Staff is of the <br />opinion that it would not be inconsistent. He then said that any construction would be contingent <br />upon all outside agency approvals and required permits including any wetland zoning district <br />requirements. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that Staff had drafted two resolutions for <br />consideration. They are both Resolution 699, the first version recommends denial of all 66 lots. <br />The second version would recommend denial of lots 1 – 34 based upon the potentially extensive <br />adverse effects to the neighborhood and inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Plan and <br />approval for Lots 35-52 and Lots 59-72 contingent upon all applicable and current building and <br />zoning codes and wetland regulations being met and satisfied. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.