Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 19, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson reviewed the request of the applicant for a rezone of <br />66 lots within the Red Oak Estates No. 3 Subdivision from R-1 single-family residential to R-3 <br />medium density residential. He then indicated that the first meeting concerning this matter took <br />place on June 5, 2002 and there was considerable resident input. He further indicated that of <br />those residents speaking out against the rezoning the main concern was for flooding in the area <br />due to already existing water issues that they did not want to have made any worse. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that Staff feels that the introduction of <br />townhomes along Greenwood Drive would not be appropriate because it is a single-family <br />residential neighborhood. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that the Planning Commission is an <br />advisory body to Council and noted the Commission is charged with making a recommendation <br />based on information provided by Staff, the applicant, and input from the community. He then <br />said it is a difficult task and noted the City Council, on numerous occasions, has said they are <br />appreciative of the work the Commission does. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that with rezoning requests two things are <br />to be looked at. The first is to review the Comprehensive Plan and determine whether or not the <br />request is consistent with the Plan. The Second is to look at the potential adverse effects on the <br />neighborhood and determine whether the use will fit where it is intended. He then said that the <br />tricky part is to allow for development that does not negatively impact the surrounding <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that the property in question has always <br />been zoned R-1 and there was never any rezoning. He then noted that townhomes were allowed <br />previously in an R-1 district with a special use permit but the Code was changed and that is no <br />longer the case. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that, at the last meeting, Staff had indicated <br />that they felt an R-3 designation on the lots fronting H2 would not be inconsistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan. And, given the high density residential across the street, Staff is of the <br />opinion that it would not be inconsistent. He then said that any construction would be contingent <br />upon all outside agency approvals and required permits including any wetland zoning district <br />requirements. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that Staff had drafted two resolutions for <br />consideration. They are both Resolution 699, the first version recommends denial of all 66 lots. <br />The second version would recommend denial of lots 1 – 34 based upon the potentially extensive <br />adverse effects to the neighborhood and inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Plan and <br />approval for Lots 35-52 and Lots 59-72 contingent upon all applicable and current building and <br />zoning codes and wetland regulations being met and satisfied. <br />