Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission January 3, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />Director Ericson reported that the building exterior would be constructed of brick or cut stone on <br />the bottom half–story of the building and a wood-grained type of maintenance free siding on the <br />top of the building. He indicated that staff would like to see the same type of exterior <br />construction carried over to the side of the building facing County Road I as well, if not on all <br />four sides. At a minimum, he explained, the frontages need to be dressed up. <br /> <br />Addressing signage, Director Ericson said he had spoken with Mr. Mezzenga who indicated he <br />would like to leave signage up to the tenants of the building. Director Ericson explained that he <br />informed Mr. Mezzenga that due to the building being located in a predominately residential <br />area, a monument type of sign would be preferred over a pylon type of sign. <br /> <br />Director Ericson further stated that he had addressed all of the outstanding issues and site plan <br />deficiencies with Mr. Mezzenga, and informed Mr. Mezzenga he would be required to amend the <br />plans accordingly. Director Ericson summarized that the site plan needs to be revised to allow <br />for a building setback of 30 feet from County Road I and ten feet from the west property line, <br />that the parking lot needs to have perimeter curbing with breaks or cuts identified for drainage, <br />that a van-accessible handicapped stall would need to be shown on the plan, and identification of <br />building and parking lot lighting, if any. He indicated that the floor plans would need to identify <br />the scale and show office square footage and room dimensions, and a computation of the total <br />leaseable office area. In addition, he reported that a grading plan would need to be submitted if <br />substantial grading is to occur or general elevations shown on the site plan with arrows to <br />indicate the direction of stormwater runoff. Director Ericson restated that a landscaping plan <br />showing the species, locations, and quantities of the plantings to be used would need to be <br />submitted as well as a detailed description of any proposed signage if known at this point. <br /> <br />Director Ericson apologized to residents for not being able to provide more notice of the meeting <br />concerning this office building. He stated that this matter would be discussed at the January 17, <br />2001 meeting if residents were unable to attend this meeting. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Stevenson requested the parking lot spaces be drawn to scale on the site plan <br />map when it is brought back before the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller inquired as to how many handicapped parking stalls were required for this <br />building. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated there is a ratio that starts with 1 to 25 and <br />goes down after that. One handicapped accessible spot would be required for this building. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Stevenson requested the Commission address the concerns raised at the <br />meeting in September 2000 for foot traffic across the lot. <br /> <br />Mr. Gustafson, the property owner, suggested using shrubbery or some type of landscaping to <br />discourage foot traffic and force it down to County Road I. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Stevenson inquired as to what the plan was to discourage foot traffic on the <br />west side or Tom Thumb side of the property.