My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-03-2001
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
01-03-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 7:35:34 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 7:35:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission January 3, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />Community Development Director explained to the Planning Commissioners that he attempted <br />to provide the best example of definitions from several different sources and combine them into <br />a glossary of definitions for review at this meeting. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Stevenson complimented Community Development Director Ericson on his <br />efforts to provide clear, accurate and concise definitions for the City’s sign code. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained he had deleted some definitions that were <br />either outdated, addressed somewhere else in the Code, or repetitive in nature making them <br />unnecessary. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller inquired as to why an abandoned sign carried the six-month time <br />requirement. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that the six-month time requirement was <br />required by state statute. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland inquired as to which definition would cover garage sale signs. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained garage sale signs are not currently <br />addressed by the code so they were not added in this set of definitions. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated if a property owner has a problem with having garage sale signs <br />located on their property it is up to them to remove the sign. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kaden questioned whether the City needed to add a definition for the temporary <br />lawn care chemical warning signs since the City is defining the small security system signs. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained he had not defined lawn care chemical <br />warning signs since they are usually only there for 24 to 48 hours, but felt this to be an incidental <br />sign, which is defined. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that as the process of revising the sign ordinance moves along there <br />might need to be changes or additions to the definition list. He stated that the Planning <br />Commission would discuss ground signage at the January 17, 2001 meeting. He told the <br />Commissioners that staff is in the process of obtaining a list of businesses in the community in <br />order to send a letter informing area businesses of the discussions concerning revisions to the <br />sign code. He explained that the letter would be sent out in time to notice for the discussion <br />concerning temporary signage on February 21, 2001. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />7. Election of Planning Commission Officers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.