Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission January 17, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Stevenson explained the six (6) foot privacy fence would need to start <br />even with Mr. Zwirn’s house not in front of it. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated Staff had drafted a resolution <br />recommending to Council approval of the development review request with stipulations, <br />assuming the Commission had no other concerns. He read the stipulations as listed in the <br />resolution to the Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller inquired as to whether the architectural features would be <br />consistent along the west elevation of the building. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated it was up to the Planning <br />Commission to decide whether it wanted to require the architectural features be the same <br />on all four sides, the sides fronting the streets, or just the side fronting Greenfield <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked Commissioner Miller why she felt the west side needs to <br />be bricked. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller indicated the west side of the building is also exposed to traffic and <br />brick would be nicer to look at than concrete block or siding. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Stevenson agreed the west side was exposed and should be brick but <br />said brick was not needed on the south side of the building. <br /> <br />Consent was reached by the Planning Commission to require the north and west sides of <br />the building to be bricked, in addition to the front facing Greenfield Avenue. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Cerny/Johnson. To Approve Resolution No. 646-01, a Resolution <br />Recommending Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Development Review Request <br />for Tony Mezzenga for the Property Located at 7664 Greenfield Avenue. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 6 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated this matter would be heard by <br />Council on February 12, 2001. <br /> <br /> <br />6. Special Planning Case No. SP-082-00 – Continuation of Sign Code Review – <br />Ground Signs <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson asked the Planning Commission to consider <br />what is currently allowed by code for height of sign, the sign area, the number of such <br />signs allowed per lot and the setbacks required. <br />