My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-21-2001
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
02-21-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 7:36:22 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 7:36:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission February 21, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />____________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Staff Reports/Items of Information 11 <br /> <br />Chairperson and Planning Commission Reports 12 <br />_____________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />3. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda <br /> <br />There were no resident comments on items not on the agenda. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />4. Special Planning Case No. SP-082-00 <br /> Continuation of Sign Code Review <br /> Invitation to Business Owners to Comment on Proposed Revisions <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained this is the third comprehensive revision <br />before the Commission. Staff took the information discussed at the last meeting and rolled it <br />into this updated draft of the Code. Staff sent out in excess of 125 letters inviting the business <br />owners in the City to this meeting and provided a copy of the existing Code on the website along <br />with a copy of the staff report. It is possible business owners reviewed the proposed changes to <br />the Code and determined there weren’t any changes they deemed restrictive enough to cause an <br />issue for them which could be why none are in attendance. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated his staff report showed the changes from the last revision of the Code and <br />asked if the Commission wanted to go through the revisions to the Code. <br /> <br />Director Ericson reviewed the changes with the Commission. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated he had an issue with allowing a two square foot pennant. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated it could be changed to one square foot but questioned whether the <br />Commission wanted to allow them at all or limit them as a temporary sign. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated he was not opposed to the temporary pennants allowed for 21 days <br />advertising a company or product. In his opinion the more permanent pennants should be limited <br />to a solid color. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland stated he finds the pennants noisy when the wind is blowing and they <br />become an eye sore if they are allowed to deteriorate in the wind. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland suggested limiting all pennants to 21 days as they are really meant to be <br />a temporary sign. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated he feels the issue is how to prevent the abuse of the use of <br />pennants. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.