My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-06-2001
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
06-06-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 7:38:09 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 7:38:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission June 4, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />Director Ericson noted the recommendation is not to allow R-2 zoning along Long Lake Road. <br />He explained the twin home would face County Road I. <br /> <br />Mr. Westlund asked what was the timeline for approval. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson said that all decisions would be made in a timely manner. He suggested the <br />Commission discuss the four recommendations on the Staff Report. <br /> <br />Chairman Stevenson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller questioned whether lot 4 could be made longer as Mr. Gustafson had <br />proposed, even though it is longer than staff had originally recommended. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated the length could be an option, though how the lots will be split was not <br />on the agenda for discussion at this meeting. Only zoning was to be discussed at this meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kaden stated he did not want any of the lots to be designated as R-2. He <br />mentioned he had spoken out on this issue at the last meeting. He clarified he came to the <br />conclusion that the R-2 designation would be acceptable to him on County Road I, but his <br />viewpoint was that he wasn’t convinced the R-2 designation would be appropriate for lots 1 and <br />2 fronting Long Lake Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Gustafson read the lot dimensions and commented that they all meet the minimum <br />requirements. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked Director Ericson what the dimensions of lots 1 and 2 should be. Director <br />Ericson said they should be 75 feet each. He added that the exact location of lot lines would be <br />discussed at a later meeting and the purpose of this meeting was to determine which lots could be <br />zoned R-2. <br /> <br />Mr. Gustafson stated that if all the lots were not rezoned, then he wanted none rezoned. He <br />exited the meeting at 7:50 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland questioned if all these lots are one property. Director Ericson responded <br />it is all one property, but split into three lots. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland stated the lot lines are important since the discussion is no longer around <br />the same lot. He stated he felt the proposal should be supported, but the lots should not be <br />allowed to be longer than 135 feet. He added that lot 4 should not be allowed to be deeper for <br />any reason. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller clarified that Mr. Gustafson stated if he didn’t get three lots rezoned to R- <br />2, he would not accept any. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.