My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-06-2001
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
06-06-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 7:38:09 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 7:38:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission June 4, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson noted that Mr. Mezzenga had applied for and <br />received approval to construct a one and a half story office building on the lot at 7664 Greenfield <br />Avenue. The building official reviewed the plans and determined they did not comply with the <br />the State’s Accessibility Requirements. Mr. Mezzenga’s options are to either add an elevator or <br />construct the building differently. The new proposal is to build a two-story building and raise it <br />four and a half feet over what was originally proposed. Director Ericson noted that as long as <br />one floor is accessible, that would meet code. He added that according to the City Code, a <br />building can be three stories high. Staff recommended that if this plan is approved, there should <br />be no upper story windows on the south end. Director Ericson reported the applicant was in <br />agreement with this stipulation. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated that notices had been sent to the residents, even though it was not <br />required. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn stated he had a conflict of interest and removed himself from discussion. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Herb Zwirn, 7660 Greenfield Avenue, stated he lives south of the proposed site and has an issue <br />with privacy. He explained this office building would look directly into his house. He suggested <br />it would have an extremely negative impact to his privacy. Mr. Zwirn stated that a privacy fence <br />would not be functional with the office building being taller. He noted that even with no <br />windows on the south of the office building, the windows on the east would look into his back <br />yard. Mr. Zwirn said that he felt this office building would be built, and therefore he would be <br />seeking a variance to build a privacy fence two feet above code. He also expressed concern with <br />the upkeep of this property. He remarked that the grass hadn’t been mowed. Some neighbors <br />have called him, since he is a Commissioner, regarding this property. Mr. Zwirn stated he has <br />picked up papers and wrappings on the property. He continued that it has developed into an <br />acrimonious situation. <br /> <br />Mr. Zwirn reported he had two realtors to his home and showed them the plans for this office <br />building and explained it would be another four and a half feet higher. Both realtors told him it <br />would have a negative impact on his property. He requested the Planning Commission deny this <br />request for an additional four and a half feet, or allow his fence to be two feet higher. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked if we have a precedence for a 10-foot high fence. Director Ericson <br />replied the City Code allows only 8 feet for a fence. <br /> <br />The applicant, Tony Mezzenga, stated he has no responsibility for this land; he does not own it. <br />He stated he did reimburse someone to cut the grass. Mr. Mezzenga explained the trajectory of <br />the two-story would go over a 10-foot fence. Mr. Mezzenga noted he had committed to building <br />an 8-foot fence for Mr. Zwirn, though he knew it wouldn’t be much help. He stated it would not <br />be financially advantageous for him to construct this 8-foot fence. He said he would not build a <br />10-foot fence. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.