My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-2001
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
06-20-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 7:38:26 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 7:38:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission June 20, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Alice Wetterling of 2716 Sherwood Road indicated she is concerned that the driveway is a safety <br />hazard as Mounds View has lots of kids on bikes, roller blades and scooters who will not be <br />aware of the driveway onto Sherwood. She then noted that she has seen two close call car <br />accidents since the driveway was put in. <br /> <br />Ms. Osterlund indicated she was unaware of any alleged close call accidents so she is not sure <br />what Ms. Wetterling is referring to. She then indicated that the previous owner had lived in the <br />house for 30 years and never had an issue with the driveway but noted that traffic was a lot <br />different 30 years ago as compared to today. <br /> <br />Mr. Osterlund indicated that neither of the gentlemen who commented have lived on Red Oak <br />Drive and have not tried to back out of his driveway. He noted there is plenty of sight line to see <br />kids coming. He noted that he had spoken to the neighbors across the street and they have said <br />they have never noticed him tearing out of the driveway. He further indicated that he drives very <br />cautiously and feels that as a future parent it is his job to look out for other peoples’ kids on the <br />streets as he expects other residents will one day do for him. He also commented that the <br />driveway is Class 5 which would be displaced if he were to tear out of the driveway which ends <br />up costing him money to repair or replace. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked if the property owners had considered an area to back up where the <br />second driveway was put. <br /> <br />Mr. Osterlund indicated he had considered a back up lane but noted there is a tree in the way <br />which he would really need to maneuver his truck around to get into position. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked Mr. Osterlund if he had driven out of his driveway forward before. <br /> <br />Mr. Osterlund indicated that he had but not from the angle Chair Stevenson had suggested. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch asked how much property there is between Red Oak Drive and the <br />property line. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kaden questioned whether the contractor had suggested that the property owner <br />might need a permit or that there might be setbacks to be considered. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked if the contractor was licensed, bonded and insured. <br /> <br />Mr. Osterlund indicated he was not sure whether the contractor was licensed as he had not <br />checked it out. He then indicated the contractor did not tell him a permit may be required. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kaden indicated that, in most cases, the contractor will offer to get the permit as <br />part of the quote. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked the Commission if they felt the hardship requirements have been met. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.