07-18-2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission July 18, 2001 Regular Meeting Page 7 ________________________________________________________________________ Director Ericson again mentioned that the City Code does not allow boarding and by omitting this statement, it does not change the City Code. This is simply a recommendation to the Council. MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Miller. To Approve Resolution 664-01, a resolution recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow an animal hospital to locate in a B- 2, limited business district, at 2625 County Highway 10, with the change of striking statement #3 and renumbering the items. Ayes – 5 Nays – 1 (Zwirn) Motion carried. Commissioner Zwirn stated he voted nay due to the removal of statement #3. Planning Associate Atkinson suggested tabling Resolution 667. No motion needed. ______________________________________________________________________________ 7. Staff Reports a. Previous Council Action: June 25, 2001, July 9, 2001 Director Ericson reviewed actions taken at the June 25 City Council meeting. The Council took action on the first reading of the ordinance on the Mounds View Animal Hospital. The second reading was on July 9 and was approved. It is not in effect yet. The development review for Mr. Mezzenga was approved. The building permit has not yet been obtained. Director Ericson reported that at the July 9 Council meeting, Mr. Gustafson presented his case. He indicated that if 2 or 3 of his lots were rezoned, he would be satisfied, as long as he had 5 lots approved. The first reading of the ordinance rezoning 2 of the 3 lots fronting County Road I was approved, predicating that Mr. Gustafson would apply for a variance for the setback. Mr. Gustafson’s house is somewhat off center, and a variance for 5 feet will be needed. He applied for a fifth lot with a reduced width. There will be a variance request for a reduced lot width for the fifth lot. The Council indicated they would approve the first reading of the ordinance, but would not hold the second reading until such time that a variance was granted and the major subdivision was applied for and approved. Commissioner Miller clarified whether the lot that should be 100 feet would now be 95 feet. Director Ericson confirmed. Commissioner Miller asked if Mr. Gustafson would need to meet the 7 criteria for hardship and Director Ericson confirmed that Mr. Gustafson would. Director Ericson stated an appeal for a shed on Mr. Baumhoefner’s property was tabled. The City Attorney informed Staff that the appeal would need to be noticed as would any variance application. This item will need to be re-notified.