Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission October 17, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that Staff had looked at the requirements he <br />just reviewed and had taken into consideration the hardship statement submitted by the Harstads <br />while drafting its report for the Commission. He then recommended holding the public hearing <br />and hearing resident input before coming to a conclusion on the variance request. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked how many utility stubs were put in at the property. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that there were ten stubs in place at the <br />property. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked Mr. Ericson to point out the wetlands on the drawing. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained the drawing for the proposed development <br />indicating the wetland was shown in blue and the open space was shown in green. He then <br />indicated the open space would be an outlot and said ownership of the outlot had not yet been <br />determined. He further indicated that the proposed development was basically the same <br />configuration as the development across the street. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. <br /> <br />Steve Feldner of 5168 Longview Drive clarified that the proposed development was not the same <br />configuration as the development across the street because there are only eight lots across the <br />street and they are all the same width. He then indicated he feels that allowing the development <br />would devalue the lots across the street because there would be 11 lots in a space that should <br />contain eight. <br /> <br />Mr. Feldner asked if the applicant would be willing to pay to put the utilities in the ground as it is <br />not possible to put the utilities behind the houses and he does not want to be looking at utility <br />poles in his front yard. He then asked if the homeowners in the new development would be <br />willing to apply for wetland permits to cut their grass as a permit is required by law to mow grass <br />in a wetland area. He also asked if residents would be forbidden to use pesticides or weed killers <br />on their lawns because there is a steep grade at the back of the lots and all the pesticides and <br />weed killers would run into the wetland. He then commented that, if that were allowed to <br />happen, the wetland would become a stagnant pond within a year. <br /> <br />Mr. Feldner indicated he did not see a viable way to develop the land as he can walk across the <br />street ten feet and be standing in mud. He then indicated that anyone who says the wetland is <br />only the blue area is lying because the whole thing is wet most of the time and if the developer <br />fills it in it will not only ruin the wetland but will create a slope that will cause things to run into <br />the wetland and it will turn it into a quagmire of rotting plants because nothing will be left alive <br />in there. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson clarified that Mr. Feldner was correct as the blue <br />areas on the map are replacement areas for fill that would be occurring. He then indicated that