My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-2001
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
10-17-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 7:40:11 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 7:40:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission October 17, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that the soil borings would need to be done <br />and submitted to the City before the City would issue a building permit and those soil borings <br />need to demonstrate that the soils can support a house. He then indicated that the developer <br />would need to dig out the peat and bring in fill that is suitable to support a house. <br /> <br />Mr. Feldner indicated that the developer could level all the trees before finding out that houses <br />cannot be built there. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that the City has made a request to preserve <br />trees up to the setback line and has asked for a tree inventory. He then indicated that trees would <br />not come down before the soil borings were completed. He further indicated that the <br />neighborhood would not be left with an open patch of land that would not support houses. <br /> <br />Pete Severson of 5172 Longview Drive indicated that there is a solid batch of trees that runs the <br />entire length of Longview Drive and shades all the houses on the east of Longview Drive. He <br />indicated that in order to put houses in the developer would have to take out the trees and put <br />fake ponds behind the houses. He then indicated he is not impressed with what happened at <br />Woodcrest and said he feels this development will destroy the wetland. He further indicated that <br />there is a lot of wildlife in the area and said he has enjoyed the natural area for the 15 years he <br />has lived there. He then asked the Commission not to allow the developer to wreck the wetland. <br /> <br />Barbara Kosiak of 5173 Red Oak Drive indicated she has lived in the City for 30 years and said <br />she is not sure she likes the deer that are in the wetland area as they eat her garden. She then <br />indicated that her main concern is with the removal of the peat that holds water and replacing it <br />with fill suitable for building houses on. She further indicated that doing so changes the water <br />management in the area and she is concerned that neighborhood residents would have wet <br />basements. <br /> <br />Dave Tillman of 5166 Longview Drive asked if the buffer zone was enacted prior to the Harstads <br />purchasing the land. He then stated that, “if you buy a swamp, you buy a swamp, if you buy bad <br />stock you lose money.” He further stated that he feels the development would impact the light <br />and air of the surrounding properties because the solid line of mature trees shades the houses <br />across the street and means that those residents only have to run their air conditioners on the very <br />hot days of summer. <br /> <br />Mr. Tillman indicated that the wetland buffer zone extends to his front yard and said he had to <br />adhere to the building Codes when he built his addition and he feels the developer should be held <br />to the same requirements. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch asked if the City had a requirement for the amount of wetlands it required. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated there was no requirement for minimum <br />amount of wetland acreage. He then indicated that some cities have no wetlands but said the <br />City of Mounds View has a great water management system. He then commented that a lot of <br />residents feel strongly about wetlands as they do offer an amenity to residents and they bring in
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.