My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-2001
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
10-17-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 7:40:11 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 7:40:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission October 17, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />used to make sure that everyone is treated the same. He then commented that Rice Creek <br />Watershed District is the local governing unit in this case and said it has indicated no problem <br />with approval of the proposed development. <br /> <br />Mr. Harstad stated that his father has paid taxes for years on the property and has paid the <br />assessments for utilities to the property. He then stated that his father has allowed storm water to <br />be dumped onto his property that contributes water to the wetland. <br /> <br />Mr. Harstad indicated that, prior to 1992 when the buffer came in to play, they would have been <br />able to develop the property and he said he is here to ask for something that is fair. He then <br />indicated that he could have followed the Rice Creek Watershed District requirements for two to <br />one replacement of wetlands but noted even more trees would have to be cut down. Mr. Harstad <br />indicated that the trees would act as a buffer for the houses from Silver Lake Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Harstad indicated that at the neighborhood meetings residents had asked that the proposed <br />development blend into the neighborhood and stated he feels it will do so. <br /> <br />Mr. Harstad indicated that the sewer and water stubs were installed and paid for at the property. <br />He then said he understands residents’ concerns for losing the natural area across the street from <br />their houses but said they own the property and are asking for a fair shake in developing it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked what the average square footage of the houses to be built would <br />be. <br /> <br />Mr. Harstad indicated that the footprint for the houses was listed as 2500 square feet. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked what the square footage of the houses in the development across <br />the street was. <br /> <br />Mr. Harstad indicated the square footages in the existing development were 1000 or 1500 square <br />feet. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch indicated she felt residents are most concerned for what filling the wetland <br />would do to their property with runoff. She then stated she has seen developments go in that sit <br />on a wetland and the neighbors are hindered by the alteration of the property and do have water <br />in their basements. <br /> <br />The residents in attendance indicated that the wetland was the lowest spot in the area and said <br />they feel a couple of small ponds would not replace the holding capacity of the wetland. <br /> <br />Mr. Harstad indicated that, as part of Rice Creek Watershed requirements, he was required to <br />submit calculations on how much ponding capacity exists prior to the development and how <br />much ponding capacity exists after the development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.