My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-07-2001
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
11-07-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 7:40:24 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 7:40:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission November 7, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Chairperson Stevenson indicated that the driveway had to be a minimum of 50 feet from a <br />certain point and asked what that point was. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated it needed to be 50 feet from the corner. <br /> <br />Chairperson Stevenson asked if that was 50 feet to the centerline and whether this request met <br />the minimum. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that the 50-foot requirement was not met with this request as the lot is <br />too small to maintain the setback from the corner. <br /> <br />Chairperson Stevenson asked if the minimum setback was met with the access onto County Road <br />I. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated it was not. <br /> <br />Chairperson Stevenson asked if the access onto Greenfield is as far from the corner as the <br />previous approval. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that there is a one or two foot difference but said that this is as far <br />away from the corner as it can be while maintaining the approved 15 foot setback from the <br />property owner to the south. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked if the City can allow it if it does not meet the setback requirements. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated he would check with the City Attorney to determine what needed to <br />be done because the plan that was approved originally did not meet the setbacks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked if all of the options for access onto County Road I had been <br />exhausted. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated he believed all of the options had been exhausted for access onto <br />County Road I. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked if it were possible to do a joint access with Tom Thumb. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that option was not explored and, in his opinion, all workable options <br />have been exhausted. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked if Mr. Mezzenga was going to address the issue with accessibility <br />regarding the entrance to the building. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that the plans submitted had to be signed off on and said that a permit <br />could not be issued unless the building official approved those plans. He then indicated that the <br />building official had visited the property and it seems that everything is proceeding properly. He
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.