1974-05-29 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ri Non Fee Ibem: Mr. Al Zepper. Amending the Zoning Ordinance, Seotion 40.03 Subdivision 6. Concerning the height of fencing. Mr. All Zapper of aawdaw Fending along with several other residents attending the meeting spoke in favor of raising the allowable heighth when putting up fencing. Mr. Al Zepper stated that moos other ooamunities a11ow up to 4 inok fenos. Other residents spoke in favor of allowing up to a 4 inch fence. The Comaiaeion after discussion among the members would liko to recommend to the Council eubjeot to approval by the Village attorney) the followings M3P Shelquist /Burmeister to reooaend to the Council changes in Subdivision 5, 2b and in Subdivision 6, both being in Section 40.03. Subdivision 5, 2b: Terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar features provided they do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal structure or to a distance lees than two (2) feet from any lot linty fences wkiok do not *wooed four (4) feet in height. Subdivision 6: Traffic Visibility. No structures excludi peaces, or planting exceeding 30 inoke ti4 center line grade of the street shall be permitted within a triangular area measured thirty (30) feet from the intersection of lot lines, along lot lines, in order to allow for visibility across the corner. Fences within the same described area aunt kmva at lsvpt 9 v y. .xoep a e_R_ may s measured from the Lit 1 ne itrade level. The underlined areas of the above Subdivisions represents the recommended changes. Mr. Ellerd Rosin, Mesaieh Lutheran Church, proposed parking lot for the church. Mr. Rosin indicated that since the proposed parking lot will be in an area that slopes sharply, a.retaing wall to the south will be built, at certain places to be 10 -12 ft. high, to create a level area for parking. A concern for drainage on Knollwood Dr. especially in the area whore Spring Creek crosses the road was expressed. Also Mr. Rosin was advised that the Churok should contact the home owner to the south of the proposed parking lot (7234 Knollwood Dr.) to get the feeling of these hose owners of how the retaing wall would affect them and their property. Also the Church is to oontaot the property owners west of the proposed parking lot (2916 Co. Rd. R2. The Commission felt that the Village Engineer should be con- tented about the drainage, and Mr. Rosin was advised that when he domes back for an official hearing before the Planning Commission, he should have complete drawings of the proposed site, showing drainage end kow the retaining wall is to be handled and the feelings of the property owners this plan will affect.