1975-12-17 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commisaion pgp,e Z ~ NoTS: The Ylt~nning Coiunisdion wanLe Go know the exaot dincnaicna at 83~6 Oroveland owned by Mr. Robert W. Bruflodt by Janusry 14. Robert Olazer statad that these two requests were tabled because of the polioy that the Planning Commission is try7.ng to fux~mulate to have aven lot spYib~, and the lot south had been aubdivided previously at 120 or 150 feet deep and we want that investigated to aee, if it is at 150 feet, iT a preoedent has been set that we ao~.~ld follow on the two lote north of it. Mr. Marlowe V. Johnaten. Property involWed - ~841 3pring Lake Rd. Minor subdivielon (?. lot.^.). Mrs. Marlowe JohneLon appeared hefore thc Conunieaion ettd rAq~iest.ed e minnr nuhAivi.aion of her oxi.ti,ng loL• ithich measures ~:50.2 x 14o feet. Harba.ra Haake moved that we bake from the table the above mentioned request of Marlowe Johnston which wae tabled on November 12, 1975• This motion was seaonded by Robert dlazer and carried. 5 aYas Me. Haake explained that thia wss tabled to discuso at Che Nevember 26 meetinQ any overall road syetems in the City of Mounds View beaauae the lot op11t the Johnstons sre requeeting would neceositate an entry from Knallwood Drlve and tho Planning Commiesi.un wan~ed to see if they had that pro~ected for the future. It was auggeated to Mre. Johr~eton thaC ahe go to her noighbors and get 2/3 of the peonle t•o aek ~or a road. She ahould contaot thr. Dunoana, Che 9elfords and ~/", the people at 2908 Hiqhway 10 and have thein come in and petition. ~ This would ba for their 140 feet lqt. M.r. t3lazer explained to Mre. JohnsCon thaC ver,y probabiy if ohe got 2/3 of her neighbora to agree to this t}~e Planning Commiasion wou].d grant her her 140 x 140 lot eplit. MSP (Olazer-Fador) to retable the Marlowe V, Johnston, 7$~1 Spring C~ake Road, rr:quest until the meeting of Jattuary 28, 5 syes Item 4 on the mgenda, Mcmorandum i~egardir.g Ccunull review of r.ew Chapter 40 was poatponed temporarlly. Ma. Haake stated thnt the Planning Commisaion ahould reviaw it for the January 14 meeb7.ng, and then at• bhat time se* up a date to meet with the Counci.l. Me, Haak~ atated that a memorandum had been reaeivad from the Me*,ropolitan Counall on the Clty's Comprehenelve Plan Update saying ih~t the Plant~ing Cosimieaion had done a geod ~ob, She then asked Councilman Shelquist if the City Cour~cil wants the aprendix, previously dlacusaEd,before it cau be npproved. Councilma~. ShelqulaC replied that he thought it could pass with what thera is, but it might be wise to conside,Y~ ~'r;eir :^quee*„ 1~ut thure is nn .legal necessity. Ic e:ae further stetad thet the P2anninp, rn~misaion terms of Paul Fedor, Nancy Burmelater and Mlchaal Lonergen wl.11 be expirinq at the end of 1975• Ma. Haake requested Councilman Shelquist to ask ~