1976-01-28 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~q' ~ eill McMaho» epoka £or Roland Miller and etated bhat the radiu~ of the rooP will rnmain th~ ~ar,.e. From the outeide af bhe building there ~ ie a 21 Eoot heighe at the peint oY the buildiny~ Thero Qre no aguj.nr in ehe building. We wi11 ebill retain the 53 parking spaoee (9 x 20). The L111ydalg Tennie Club hae 9 indoor tennis courte and 9 racguet bal~ courte, whioh is muah larger than oure, and have 72 parking plaaee and their parking Zot haa never been filled. If ws run into a parking situation we do have a tennis court runninq eaet and west and we can usg that if it becomes neaeseary. Ms. Burmeistet: etated that our zoning Qode has to be applied to everybody. I£ we let you go ~elow khan eomebody else can come back and not think thie is a good argument. Mr. Fose stated khat he folt that parking ie plenty adaquate when corr,pared to okher courta. Councilman Shelquiet auggested ~hat if you grac.t a variance on the parking you qive consideration to what you would be willing to liva with in a aimilax type of facility. Me. B~i•rtteieter aeked if many probleme will come up with juat tl~e one exit. That is w}~y I wondered if you had conaidered a road. Have you checked what tho width would be if you went bahind 51mon's? Steve from the ataff atated thal• there is enough room to do it if they want to. i reully think their 53 spacea would bo adequato in moat aituatione exaept Eor once or twica a yesr. Mr. Mackeben stated that he waa not concerned about t.he parking or the exi~. ' Diauussion followed aa to what to call the structur.e. ids. Burmaister ' atatad that it ie by itaelf, not attached to the principle bullding. It is not a building, it is a atructure. Steva: I feel.it would come under an accessory builling. I ~., Ms. Haake etated that we ~ave to define what it is. , sill McMahon wanted to know if ~t could be evaluated ae part af. the origlnal project? The entire thing wil.l bo enalaaed at a 10 toot haight. We will go 6 axonnd the decor of the building hut have to go ta 10 feat where the courta ara. Councilman 8he2quist stated that 1t is a atructusa rather than a fence haoause it ia permanettt in a sense and it is sdequately aet,back 'I ~caa thv property line. St ia part af the use of the ].and. Guese ,ycu , don't have to grant a variance on the height ot it. i Me. Haake poiled the Conmisoion an to whether to det.ino i~ as ~: ! accesaory building. Mr. F~es: Fits the fiefinitton of str.ucture, ~uat giva them permission. Mr. Rosaman: Side yard set backs no problem. j Ms. Blanchard: What are we oparating under: the pruposed p1an3 Ms. Burmeieter: No anower ' Mr. Glazer: tend toward varianc9. Mr. Fedor: Grant variance becauae we have a proposed zoning ordinance that will brina it into the neighbnrhood. Mr. ~hai:ka~sn: Concerned abont granting that varia~aaa buC it is good pianning so would grant it. Ms. Haake: ~u-25 foot s?thack in caaes 11ke thi~. I would say yes. ~ Aoland Miller atated that the parking tacil.it,~aa at ?ak companp would not be available at all timea. Th~y propooe Eo have gates, and when Chay had a tournament the gates would ba opened and extend their parking back there. Ma. eurmeister etaked that there wa~t no neod for it every day and ~~'' an agreement could be written up to this effoct.