My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1976-03-10 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
1976-03-10 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 4:22:26 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:22:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. ~ 2- <br />! <br />Mr. Cooney then aeked, if ~hey attampt9d to hsve St ohangod nC a laver <br />~ date what do you do? <br />Ms. Haake etated ihat tltey would hava to have a publl.o hearing an~9 <br />neighboze fr~m up to 150 feet away would be given notice of this. <br />Mr. Cooney had no further qnestione. <br />MSP (Glazer--ROeaman ) to recall the 3elmer Sakariaeon matter <br />from the table. 9 ayee <br />Ren Sjodin, the realtor for the developer, arrived. Ms. Haake <br />explained to him that there is no problem with the subdivipton. How- <br />ever,~until the houae and garaga are rc~movra t;here would bo no building <br />permik iseuad. The owner etated that he would like to live <br />in the houea ae long ae posaible. What is ycur intent? <br />Mr. 9~odin replied that thty intendod to build on one of tho lota <br />that doea not have the house u±;3 garage, and aince the ownEr is <br />movinq anyway they thoaght they would let him take his time. <br />Me. Haake asked him whera he was go3nq to get the fill? <br />Mr. 6jadin eaid that it would not come fzom the other lota but would <br />probably be brouqht in. Thero ian't that much that is needed. <br />Ma. Haake atated £urthor that he would need to have a goada plan <br />r.~. bPEore the per.mit can be iasuad. <br />t~ Ma. Burmeleter explained that it would be 60-90 days before anything <br />could ba done anyway. <br />Mr. Sjodin atated that Ramsey County has already approved it contingent <br />upon the City of Mounds 'View. <br />Ma. Haake state~. Ehat they had recelved a letter from Rameey County <br />and thera was no preliminary approval from anyone. <br />Mr. Foea safd that he,felt that the Commisa'_on was making a big iaeue <br />of this. They ara juat trying to improve the area. Except for <br />Lots 2 6 3, why nct gire them the OR to go on Lota 4& 5 1L• they tear <br />th~ garage ~inwn. <br />Mr. Sjodin said that they could do 9.t immediately but it wuuls La a <br />hardehip on the man khat 1.s movi.ng out. <br />Mr. R~saman 05$9d the date that. the h~usn will bo re~r.;~ved. <br />Mr. Sjodin replied in June or July. <br />Mr. Aosn;man eaid "Lat us make iti July 1". <br />Mr. Sjudin replie3 that praaticaliy, tlii~ i~ riyht anyway becauea <br />nobody buyinq a$60,000 home wonid ntand for the old houae stii11 being <br />on the property. <br />MS (BurmeZater-Zepper) to recommend to the Council that thoy approve <br />tho major eubdivisian oE Selmer Sakariauon at 83~4 Eastwood Driva, <br />Chapman Addition, Outlot A, creating 5 lota, each lot being A1 x 23G. <br />Buildinq parmite can be issued on Lots 1,4 or 5 provided tha garage <br />. ie taken down on Lot 4£irat. Also the Eill far Lotn 4 and 5 to be <br />, <br />~/ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.