Laserfiche WebLink
-4- <br />tdnrlan J. Arndt <br />0 3 erwao3~ R~. <br />(~ Mr. ARndt paid hie fee two waeka ago and wanta the Commisalon to oonaider <br />" thie bype of spiit. He reported that the property involved ia at <br />84~14 Castwood and that there ie no problem on drainage. The lot dimeneion <br />!e presently 468 x SO1. He ie requesting ^n even lot split to areate <br />two lote, 234 x ioi. <br />He explained the urgenoy in thia ie °i,;,t in oi~de, to apply for a VA loan <br />the buyer has to have a deeoription of hie land, et•a. and must 9ay that <br />legally ha has bough; it. <br />MSP (4lazer-ROSSmbn) to reaommend to the CouneG:l that they e~prove the <br />lot eplit for Marlan S. Arndt at 8444 Eaetwcod. Thls lot ep2iC wi21 <br />areete two 7.ots, the eaat lot being 234.04 x].01.26 and the west lot <br />being 234.04 x 101.26. Th1s reccmmendation is contingent upon aonourrerice <br />by the bui.lding inapectnr, aH it :nay require a drainnge and grade plan. <br />8 ayes <br />NO'PE: The 8uilding Inspector has not made an in~peotion of thin <br />property yet. • <br />Mr. Arndt's request wae contstctered because he had paid his fe~ on <br />Mareh 29, 1976, and the c+taff did not receive the sketch plan prior to <br />this evening's meeting, whiah is usually required, but ~he rule wae <br />waived. <br />Petron <br />~ <br />~~fd9 7ooCdale Drive <br />Mr. Petr~n appeared before the Gommieaion tn sea how St fsit about hio <br />proposed lot aplit. Af*er diseueaion, a roll call wss taken: <br />Mr. Mackeben: It would becom~ sabstanQard eo I would vote no, <br />it would be landlocked. <br />Mr. Fector: Same. Nelghbor~a tiome is lonated ao oloae. <br />Mr. Olazer: Too severely subatanciard. <br />Ms. 8urmelater: Agree with Aon. <br />Ma. Blanchard: Said no before and w111 not chsnRe now. <br />Mr. Foss: Agree <br />Mr. Roseruan: Too subatandard. <br />of Agriculture. Suil ConservaCion ~srvicQ., regera7.ng cne cooperaLive <br />agraement between the City uf Mounds View and the Ramsey Soil~and W~.ter <br />Conservation DSsCrict. f4s. Haake asked for c~mments to give to the <br />Counoil regarQipg this agreement. <br />1. When a reyuest i.a made pertaining to a private development <br />the devcloper wi.ll be required to pay the charge. <br />2. A comment on H 5, is triat wher, the requesC is made pertaini.ng <br />"'', to a nrivate devalopment the developer wili be required to pay <br />~`J any charges for the mentioned materiels in M 5• <br />