1976-09-08 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

_~_ MSP (Ulaxer-7,epper) to raaommonQ to the Counail that thQy aoprove the speciul uae pormit raqueut of Alvin Pedorenn, 69i0 Plenoant View Drive, lnaamuah ao the Councl.l hns.al.ready oot a preaadettb. .,-.` 6 aycs Burmelster - Iiaake 2 nnye his. Burmeister etated that she voted nny beoauoe techniaaliy vre still have 1~1,ri eq teet on the boo{co and wo oannot ~e en the assumption about what the Councll Vrill do, and ~he can aee no hardohip. f4s, ftaalce told f4r. Ped,ers~n to rgll and find out If tY.e ,y0 foc aovera all costa. Robert F. Leatina ~ l~roperty ~nvolVed: G339 Pleasant View Dr3ve Speeial Uee Permit (oversized acae~sory building? Applicant vrishes to build a 2 uar garage and to keep the oingle. car gara~e elready exlstin~. The purpose of ti~is orould be to house a boet, They would sod the extra driveo-ray. A citizen stated that• 5f11bur Johnson's two accessory buildin~a have been approved trrith overaize doors, tio he cannot see why these people cannot have one car ~3rage and un acceseory building. Ms. Haalce explained that the Lestina~s are aeld np, for something lar~er yet and ib Ss on the lot line. ~.-~ P~r. Muckeben aslced why Mr. Sohnson'o request wes approved by the Councll + and Coun.ilmnn ShelquSst replied ti~at they went and looiced nt it and ,J felt thttt in that psrticular czse it wa's a situstion where it was allowable--the lot vras d~ep and very nent. Mr. Leatina stated that the.property on the other si,de has a para6e of close to lUUO aq feet. They coula not bu11d a big~er builciing ao it would be too expensive and they orould have to remove too many treea. fqe. Burmeiater moved to deny the requeat of Robert 1'. Lestina to build a 2 car garage becnuse the•re is already an existin~ garage on the property und our ordinance only allovrs one ~,ara~,e. fQotion died for lack of a aecond. 41r. Laetina said that he was tif1111ng to Urick. ~.t over and put in a 2 foot ' door or whatever i'J0.8 neaec~sory. ' t4r. Fose stated that Daeically it has been an accesnory building all along.' MSP (Et~ake-7eppor) that ~ae rAcommena to thc~ Counc~.l that they deny the Robert F. I,e3tina, G~34 P1CA86ttt V1Q47 Dr.ive, requeet for nn overeir.ed accessory building. The accesnory Uuildir.g on the sout)~ 31de of their lot l0 12 x 2G, It ia slso on the property .line and perhaps even into the lnt• aouth of them. The r.equest ia ^G sq !'eet.mnre than Y,he proposed new accessory buildin~; oiza of 21G 3q feet, 5 ayea [Qackeben-fiedor-6lazer: 2 aUst.