1977-03-09 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ be grsnted option to hava 5 f.oot easemonts on ail lot linas within the plat at their descrot.ion, apgroval Uy staff of final grading plan, vnrianca of 82 foot lot line on Lot 1, and a 4 foot variance on Lot 2 for existing home, also subject tc the agraement to pay assessments fnr all servicas installed, subject to petition by property ownexs to waive the right to a publtc hearing, and recom- mendaLion that no building parmits be issued on Lots 9-15 until 8ona Road is installad. 5 ayes ~~~ .~ i Louis ltindalil Property involvod: 8372 Red Oak Drive Major Subdivision (onc lot into three) Rindshl Addition Preliminary Plat Ken Sjodin represented Mr Rindahl. Applicant has suUmitted pre- liminary plat for appraval. The plat consists of three lots, one fronting Rod Oak Drive 90' wido by 325~ doep ~ith the remaining two lots fronttng Fairchild Avenue. 1'he north lot to be 106~ wide by 14~' deep, and +he south lot tu be 96.5' wide by 148~ deep. MSP (Zeppar-Bedor) to recommend to the Council that they apprnva tha iniYialed preliminary plat o£ Louis Rindahl, 8372 Red Oak Drive, recefved Ly the City of Mounds View on February 24, 1977 as presented. 5 ayes 1 E Gustafson Property involved; Lot 30, Blk 3, Greenfield Plat 2 Approx '1664 Greenfield Avenue Variance (set back requirements) ' B-1 Office Duilding Devolopment Mr Rose explained that the applicant is requesting approval of a plot plan for an office building development. The applicant requesLs variancas oE 5' on street side yard setback, of 10~ on residential side yard setback, of parking spaee size 9~ x 20' instead of ~~' x 20', of number o£ parking spaces requited 29- 30 (provided i8), and of a curb cut 2' ovar maximum. Considerrt- tion should slso be given to tha Comprahensive 1.¢n~ Usa Plan. Tt designatas the use of the proposQd 1ot to be ?dadium Denstty Residential. The proposed offica building would be a 1~ story, building 73' x 32~, Mr Gastafson questioned as to why Tom Thumb is right up agsinst his lot line xnd he has to be restricted. Ms tlaake axgla9.ned to him that they ware under the old code and this will bo under the new one. Under the new code, there hus to be a variance. Mr Gustafsoa is asking 25, and there has to be 30. Thq parking spaces Wi31 elso reqi~ire a variance; and tha siza of tha spaces hss gone up a h foot as well. &ho asked if thare was any way that he cculd modify his pian to came within the code. Mr Gi.is- ta£spn said that any less would be too cramped. , ,_ .,