Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms Heake stated you just want this snace available it the need ovor <br />/°~ arises. If the airport is gone, it could be back to 1-2 zoning. <br />~ ) Wa planned it so thet we did not put industry next to residential, <br />sticking it rigt;± next to us is nat helping. <br />Mr Schranz assured her that Mounds View would have input into any- <br />thing Bleine does. He knows that thay ara concerned about traffic. <br />Ms Haake asked if U1¢ine would be sntisfiad to exclude the inter- <br />changa now and consider it in the future if nesd arises. Mr Schranz <br />said Mounds View can say they went it, buC Bleino wants the cepa- <br />bilities. He said i£ he lived in Mounds View, he would be more <br />worriad about the airport than ¢ha intarchange. <br />Gaorge Gusta~son stated Bla3ne probably wants to 1et this go thruugh <br />and the fdderal government put the raads in. <br />Dave Westrum suggest~d having another meeting and asking a reprs- <br />sentative from DOT, 6~C Metropolitan Council, MTC, Anoka County <br />Planning Dapartment, state legislators and Blaine as well. <br />It was also suggested that a task force bo formed to study the pro- <br />blems. This will he 2he group that is going to loak into these <br />issues that are unclear at this tiTe. <br />D~s Haaka said that anyon~ interestad in sarving on this task :orce <br />to plaase come forward. <br />~~+' Commissioner Zepper stated we are voieing concern that Blaine is <br />going to own all that property, when you take the right of way <br />there won't be much land left by the tima it is dono. <br />Mr Schranz suggestad a linear trail, cnd talking to the perk dir~c- <br />tor about it. <br />kdm.in Achon responded to e comment about taking Red Oak Drivo back 1 <br />frum the caunty. The c~unty acyuired it in the mid ~60s to nrovide 9 <br />transportat3on system 'ta tho county rasidents. It is not a vory j <br />integral raxt of tho caunty's traff3c Falan. Tha county has no great ; <br />dnsira to kaep it, but if we want it 6ack, we have to pay for th~ <br />signal. If we wanted to +.ake on it•s responsibi2ity, we could pro- <br />bahly have it bnck. You cnuld provent it fron~ being enlarged, but ; <br />if you have this interChanga and have accidents, the people will <br />want Rad Oak improved. Ownership does not s£fect the impact. If <br />tlea interahange was going in, the best thing wou1~3 be to havA somo- <br />body else own it and payfor it. <br />A citizen from Eastwood Road said we had to give in to the shopping <br />center, I don~t believe we can fight the MAC. , <br />Ms Haake .ststed that wa can tryl Get on the task f'orcel <br />~?'he public hbaxing adjourned at 10:30 PM. <br />Judy Swanholm <br />Recording 5ecretnry <br />