1977-04-13 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mike White, Sunnyside Builders, submitt~d a petitidn f:~on 18 (~ homeowners in the neighborhood of the proposed rezoned lot, consenting to 4he building of e Juplex there, Ron Mischa, owner of this 1at, felt it was Che Ses~ possibla use of this land. I~a staCed he has receivad calis for placing everything but a single fsmily homa nn it, Thare e:a duplexe~ for three blocks to the south of this lot, and he felt this une would make littl9 differonce, especially since they have designed a duplex which looks Sike a single family homa, Thoy displayed the blueprint to the Commi.ssion members, MSP (Poss-Blanchard) to approva the rezoning of the north ].00' of Lots 1 and 2, Blk 1, Cleerviaw Addition from R-1 to R-2, 2 nays 5 ayes Cort~issi~nar Glazer fezt duplexes aro being unfa.iri~• used es buFfess batween the noise of the business distric",. and. the quiet of the residental neighborhoods, which results in a lack of real quality living for many people. Bose Singer Property invoivad: 7850 Spring Lake Road Rbzoning and Conditional Use (R-1 to R-4) ,,~1 S3ngax Thorapuetic GencepCs has mede an upplicatlon for a recu- ~"'~^~~ ifTapprovadmewillbcarry$aeDPWtRule~5SliceSse~as a~c111dTcaringe~ institution fox a mekimum of 12 giris, ages 13 to 17. Tha nome will be operated by fiva fulltlme staEf on a 24 hour hospf.tal shift basis. Steven Rose explainad that ihe hame and ].at to be razoned from R-1 to R-4 with ct Conditional Ose Permit is presontly denoted low ciensity ~singin innf2>J in the Cemprehensive Plan and zoned R-i. If Lhe rezoning were approved by the City, the R-4 zqning xould remsin in the ev~nt the requested use would vacate, while the conditional use permit wou13 become vo3d. In. viawing a con- dit3onal use permit, il~A Planning Commission must consider pos- sible adversa effects of tho propose~l amendment or conditionel use, such as: relationship to municipal comprehensive plan; the geographical area ittvolved; whethor such use will tand to or actually depreciate the area in whi.ch it is proposed; the chnracter c~f tho surraunding aren; the demonstrated need for such us~. The exist3ng lot would not meet all zoning code physical requira~ r monts. Code would requira e3ght 9k x 20' parkad parking spaces. Three spaces are pros^ntly providad. Additional paving would be requirud or a varfance granted. Code tslso required doubla , side yard setback af such a proposad use. The total side yard ,-$'~-~ satback wouZd bo 40~. Existing conditions would raquire s F,~ vsriance nn Lhe south sida of one foot and 22~ on tha north side.