Laserfiche WebLink
°i - 4 <br />~ 1 RelatlonsM p to the Municipal Comprehensive <br />,~q 2 Georgrephlcai area fnvolved <br />/ ) 3 Whether such a use w111 tend to depreciate <br />~ 4 Cheractsr af Lho surr~unding area <br />6 Uemonstration of a need for such a use <br />P1an <br />the area for which it is proposed <br />There would also be p9rking and screening cansiderations. Thern would be a minlmum <br />of elght marked perkt~g speces, 9~ x 28' requirad. At present, three are provided <br />for. There vrould have to be additionel paving or a variance. Atsa, side yard <br />variances wouid be required of both sides. They propose to put a six foot screening <br />fence around the entire property. A variance wouid be required for the gix:foot <br />fence in the front yard. <br />Patrick Sweeney, attarney for Singer 7herapeutic Concepts, stated Rose Singer has <br />bean in the field uf recuperative care of female ,~uveniles and is a prnfessional <br />in this area. She has gone through the application process, has gone through Che <br />State Hea7th Board and We]fare Oepartment and has met their conditiuna, and has <br />complied wiCh a71 state and c~~unty regulations for thi, type of facility. She <br />comes wlth the lntent of working with the comnunity to maet some of the needs of <br />these ~uveniles. He further stated that there are sone fuveni7es from this area <br />thzi could use the facillty. It would be an asset to the :ommunity and heip them <br />better understand whaC can be dune with recuperation in a residential setting. Pir <br />Sweeney's ~ob is Co meet any of the state and county comnission rules as far as <br />legal questions. They would intend ta being it back to R-1 if anythtng should <br />happen or if it were going Co be used as a different type of facility at a future <br />date. <br />i~~ A question was asked a, to the d9fference between Rule 8 and Rule 5, and Mrs S7nger <br />~w' replied that Rule 5 is much more strict as far as requirements; different number of <br />staff and numbers of children, A house cannot accomnodate moF•e than nine youngsters <br />under Rule 5. Ru1e 6 allows as many as the fac111ty could hatd. Mr Rose was <br />incori~ect, siie added, when he said 12 previously; it shou7d have been eight. <br />Gordon Kuluvar <br />7815 Gloria Circle <br />Mr Kuluvar asked if hc could present some questions for the comnunity. <br />1 Identify what a conditionai permit entails; a certain amount of time7 <br />2 Would it remain R-4? <br />3) lJhat impact wi71 the plans, if rezoned, have on the tax base of the cammunity7 <br />Mr Sweeney replled that unless they applied for an exemption, it would tncrease the <br />taxes. 7hey do nnt fntend to apply for a tax exzmption as they are a private cor- <br />poration. <br />David Riley <br />7E3?0 Gloria C1r1e <br />Mr R11ey stated he lives in this residential neighborhood, What happens in the <br />future? Can you guaranlee me that :;he will nat sell to a non-profit organization7 <br />Mr Sweeney said there could be a convenent; Chey ineend to bring it back to R-1. <br />~~ It wou7d not reduce the tax base, it would lncrease it. <br />