Laserfiche WebLink
ME@TING Op THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />,r~ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br />r i RAMSEY COUNTY, h1INNE50TA <br />The meeting of the Mounds View Planning Commission Was called to order et 7:30 PM <br />on Wedne~~a:.y, August 10, 1977 aC. ~he Mounds W ew City Nali, 2401 Hlghway 30, Mounds <br />View, Pilnnesota 55112. <br />Members Present: . <br />Chalrperson Haake Commission Member Burnieister <br />Commissiun Member Mackenben Comnission Plember 8lanchard <br />Comnission Member Fedor Cortmission Member Foss <br />Corm~isston Member Glazer Council Member 9aumgartner <br />Building & Zoning OPficial Rose <br />Commissian Member Zepper was noted as absent without excuse, <br />Correctinns of the July 20, 1977 minuLes were submitted by Chairperson Glaxer;,Page 4 <br />second from the test paragraph, first sentence siiould read "COmnission Member Giazer <br />stated that the city would be in a much better~ bargaining posi~tion if they mainCafned <br />a lower density zone durtng the ~nterim." Page 14, the tast sentence of the motion <br />should ~ead "The discussion and reasons for the sp11t vote on Compassion Centers <br />request to expand its schoot certainly app7les tu muCh greater extent to th4s request:" <br />r-~, Page 15, secand paragraph should read !'Commission Member Glazer stated that access mi <br />'"' and oPf of Nighway i0 from Red Oak Drive is already difflcult. Therefore, Nillvizw <br />~' Road wouid nrabably be used as an alternate route." <br />Cammiss4on Member Fflss asked that the motion on page 16 be corrected to read as <br />seconded by Commission Member Burmeister rather than himseif. <br />Comnission Member fedor entered the meeting ac 7:38 pM. <br />MSP (Haak.e-Burmeister} ~o approve the Juty 20, 1977 minutes as cor~rected, 6 ayes <br />VARIANCE kEOUEST OF ROB£RT i{ANSfN, 8415 KNOLLW000 DR7VE <br />Official Rose repor~ted that Mr> Hansen has requested to build a G2' wide house and <br />attached garage on a 75' wide lot. Mr. Hahsen has requested a 1' variance on both <br />sides of the house. i'he !ot has substandard fron,tage 6ut is buildeble and has <br />necessary services. On tf~e 7ot to the south, the linuse is 14' from the lot lin~ <br />(10' is required), and on the 1ot to the north the house is 15' from tire iot'iirte <br />(±0' is requtred). <br />Officiat Rose recorrmendad that the house strucfiure be at the north end of the lot, <br />allowing a 9' setback from the lot line. Tnera is an existtng 5' drainage easemenk <br />along the north lot 11ne. If the garage is placed on th~ north side, the setback <br />would have to be 5', as the easement is not ~uildabte. The house/garage p)ace could <br />be on either s~lde as long as a minimal setback of 5' 1s obse'rved on the north side. <br />~ Official Rose recommended that the Gamnission approve t!!e variaace request as <br />existinc~ structures on both sides, tog~ther k~ith the new structure, provide more <br />thbn adequate setback. He no4ed that the lot has a substandard frontage end stated <br />that the Comnlssion must stata hardship lnvotved 1f the varlance is granted. <br />