Laserfiche WebLink
, °~August 1Q, 1977 Page 6 <br />~ MSP (Bianchard-BUrmeistor) Lo recommend to tha Councll that they say thaE aqy <br />~r.hicle over one ton ahasis design that doea not have e recrr.ational veM cle licenso <br />would not be aompetibte end therQfore nut allowed to be parked in a residential <br />area. 6 0.yes <br />1 ~ay <br />Chalrperson Naake stated that she woutd like her letter to the City Council of <br />July 29, 197i, explaining Allen Yepper's dlsmissal from the Planntng Commtssion on <br />Ju7y 20, ly%7 be edded to ihe minutes of toni ghts meeting nnd thet the reply from <br />John Pickar, dated August 9, 1977 also be included, wfiich pertained to the'City <br />Ordinance 215 regarding confllct of interesC on the Pianning Com~nission and City <br />Councll. Sire staCed thot sh~ now knows Aow to deai with any confitct of interest <br />situetfon which may arlse in the future. She als~ stated that Mr. Zepper concurred <br />wlth her decision at the time she spoke to him at the July 20 meeting thaC he not <br />participate as a canmissian member during the discussion. <br />Comnission Memb~r Mackeben staCed that he felt each Commission Member should be <br />eilowed to reniain seated if he ~id not have a financial conflict of interest <br />end be altnwed to state the9r thoughts on any issue. <br />; <br />'; Councitmembsr Baumgartner stated that Attorney Meyers hed said that the Counctl <br />or Conmission members have the right to get out and pound the drums en an issua. <br />' Cnnmisslon Maclceben ques N oned the comments fram the City Council that a Pianniny <br />i Commission meeting was not held Juty 13 due to lack of a querem. He stat~d that <br />~ 1t wes ptanned in advance that there would net be e meeting. <br />~ Councllmembaw Baumpartner replied that the reason the meeting was not planned was <br />theC they knew in advance there would not be a quarem. <br />dfficisl Rose requested Commission Members to review the issue of home occupations <br />1n single famlly restdenttal areas and be prepared to diicuss it at their next meeting. <br />I ~ Commission hlember Foss stated that Colum6la Heights had a good det'inition for home <br />occupations 9n a singla famlly resid~ntial area end recer~nended that they flnd out <br />I how 1t reads. <br />~ Comnisslon Member Burme9ster asked why the issue wes bafng hroueht up again. Officia7 <br />P.ose'peplled thet it was being bpought up due to current probleme with the dePinition <br />and intant. <br />MSP (Fass-kackeben) to ad~ourn the meeting at 8:45 PM. , 6 aye¢ <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Pameta Young <br />Recordtng Secretary , <br />~tr/ <br /> <br />