Laserfiche WebLink
MEETTNG OF THE PLANNING CQhiMISSION <br />CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br />r"~ RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br />The meeting of the Mounds View planning Cmm~ission was catled ta order at 7:30 PM <br />on Wednesdny, September 14, 1977 at the Mounds W ew City Hatl, 2401 Highway 10,' <br />Mounds View, Minnesota 55112. <br />Membere Present: <br />Chairperson Haake Cormission Member Dlanchard <br />Cannission Member Fedor Commission Member Foss <br />Comnlssion Me~nber Burmeister <br />7he minutes of ttte August 10, 191% Planning Cnmmisslon fdeetinu were approved os <br />read. <br />Chairperson Haake asked if anyone in the audience was there tu discuss t,he home <br />occupatinn issue and nxplained that due to the excessive amaunt of items on the <br />evening'c agenda, the issue would be discussed at the,next Ptanning Comrission <br />meeting on Qctober 12, 1977 and apo7oglzed t4 anyone who may have been incahvenienced <br />by the postpomnent, <br />MINOR SU80IVISION REQUEST OF DALE 8Et~7LEY, 78i15 ~REEMVOOD DRIVE <br />:hairpoerson Haake explained that Mr. Bentley was requesting to subdivide his corner <br />lot 230' x 131' inta two lots. The corner lot with an existing hon~e located on it <br />woi+ld be 130' fronting Hi11v1ew and 131' fronting Greenwood Drive. The in4erior <br />1ot franting Nillview would be 100' wide by 131' deep. , <br />Planning cunsideratlons include that bath lots meet size requiremants of both <br />frontage and square footage, a11 structures on interior and exterior of property <br />1nvolved meet minimal setback requirements, sewer service is avaiiabie nt street, <br />but no water service is provided. It was r2comnended that sinr.e 9t was the last <br />lot to b,r, developad between Long Lake Raad and Greemvood Orive that an additional <br />10' easement be taken along HillvieN frontage to allow the placenent of a private <br />water line for the new lot. The water 4mprovement would have to be put in at the <br />owner's expense. Also, electrical power could be taken from the south property 1ine, <br />and the south 5' shouTd be taken as a drainage and ut171ty easem~nt. Mr. BenC]ey <br />has y9ven 10' drainage (5' each lot) along the carmon lot line. <br />Comn9ssian Member 0urmeister asked Mr. Bentley if he realized Chat he or the purchaser <br />of the property would be responsibte for putting in water and untilit•ies at his expense. <br />t4r. Bentle,y replied that he was aware of that. He also staCed that there was already <br />an exisCing ut111ty easement cn the east side of the proparEy Chat was there when he <br />purchased 1t. <br />MaP (Foss-~tanchard) to yrant OaTe Bentiey's request far a ninor subdivisian frae one, <br />lot into two as submltted in I~is request, with a 70' easement on the north boundmry <br />tine and 5' easements eleng the south and common 1ot 1ine, and a 5' eesement, if there <br />(s not already one there, on the eest praperCy 11ne for dralnage end ut111ties. 5 ayes <br />~ <br />