Laserfiche WebLink
, 5eptember 14, 1977 Page l0 <br />~in R-3 that mulEiple famity dwe111ngs contaTning six or less 1lving untts are <br />alluwed. 1'herefure, kMs is a two ~we111ng unit which would be atiowed under <br />retoning. The Council should refer to Chapters 40.12 and A0.73. <br />VARIANCE REQUEST FOR HUGH DICKINSON, 8068 EASTWOOD <br />Officiai Rose axpla!ned that Mr. Dickinson fias requested a variance for reduced paved <br />service set6ack to within 7'9" of the lot line to prnvide a drive to a rear yard <br />for a garage he wishes to build. <br />P1an.~ing cunsiderations include that the applicant's existing garage is undersized <br />and he wishes to remodel it into a porch and then constru^t a new two-sta17 garege <br />in his rear yard. A7so, the appllcanC has an 11'9" setback ~rom his existing garage <br />to his lot line. He wishes to piace a 70' paved service aEutting the remodeted <br />garage to extend back to his proposed new garage. The applicant's lot and the iot <br />ad~oining ±lie proposed reduced setbach have 82'5" frontages. <br />Mr. Dickinson's son-in-iaw stated he was representirg him and stated that Mr. Dickinson <br />OWlii the vacant lot next door also, <br />Cumnisston Member Foss asked if Mr. pickinson had explored the possibility of putting <br />the garage in front of the existing one. His san-in-law replled thut he had ~ot <br />cons9dered it because of the ftowers and landscaping in front and the angles of the <br />_.. structure. <br />,_.:'MSP (N3ake-Mackeben) to grant the variance request of Hugh Dickinsan, 8086 Eastwood <br />for a 1'9" setback variance for a drivQway to go tfirQUgh frcm the street, around the <br />side ofi the house to a new garage to be bu17t in the back. The hardship is that the <br />existing garage is gotng tn be converted into Tiving space for the Pami7y and the <br />only way to get back to the new garage would be along the side of Li~e garage. 6 ayes <br />Chairperson ~aake asked.that at this time the Cominisston return to the previous <br />discussion of the rezoning request for Steven Loeffler. There was much discussion <br />among C.omnission Members and it was decided that the Planning Comnissian had mis- <br />understood what Mr. Loeffler was requesting. <br />MSV (Zepper-MACkeben) to recind tha previous motion reaAing "to downzone the propertq <br />at 7659 Wood'lewn Drive from R-4 to R-2 ta permit dupiex constructlon for Steven <br />Loeffler" which had been passed. 6 ayes <br />MSP (Mackeben-Foss) to approve the Loeffler dup7ex proposal on l.ot 6, Block 2 of <br />Parkview Terrase and that the applicant enter into a deve7opment ngreement to insure <br />the planting, so~ding and paving required improvements are made, and that the <br />appticant has agreed to revise the plat plan to meet building setback requirements <br />and that the Council consider downzoning the land with the applicant's approval be- <br />cause the use fs lower than the existing zoning. 6 ayes <br />~ <br />`.r.~~ <br />