1977-11-09 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NovembE~ 9, 1977 Pag~ 8 ' would not be compatibie k~ith the rest of the netghborhood. ~ouncilmember Bauingartner asked the Planning Commission members Co consider Mr, Tomas' co~nents about the higher cost ard stated thnt if Che Commission were to approve four lots rathPr than five, they would be pricing many people aut of a home. Commission Member Rurmeister pointed out that there were targe lats in the neighbor- hood and that the City did not know what was 9oin~ to be developed yet on the Berwyn Additlon 1ots. MSp (hiackeben-Fedor) to ask the City Council to deny the request of Eugene 7amas for a ma~nr subdivision at 5D65 Bona Road because of the substandard 1ot frontage and substandard square footage, which dues not create a hardship. 6 ayes 3 nayes Commission Members Zepper, Blanchard and Foss voted against the m~tion and Cormiission Member Zepper explained the reason for voting against the motion was that there were older> sma7ler homes in the area and tihaC the hfgher price would price several people right out of a home. MINOR SUBDIVISIOh RE~EST Of CEDAR BAY BUIlOERS - 8347 GREENW00~ DRIVk Official Rose reported that the applicant has requested to subdivide the parcel fronting Greenwood Orive 202.5' x 146' deep, except for the north 16.5', which extends west to front Eastwood Road. The subdivision request would create two equal frontage lnts of - ~. 101.25' on GreentJOOd ~riVe. __. Plnrning considerations include that both lots meet all size requirements and that services have be:~+i provided for a two lot subdivision. The I6.5' leg extandirog to Eastwood Road should be combined with the property to Lhe souCh, if possible. Parcet e has an existing garage located on it whicn meets setback requirements for the subdivision. Also, if the 16.5' property leg is not cambined with the soutih property, t,he west 327' and the north 16.5' should be recorded as dralnage and utility 2aseroents, Otherwise, the rear 5' should be required for drainage and utility easements. Rudie Bayer, developEr of the property stated that he dfd not feel he shou7d have to take the yarage off the property. Iie aiso stated that he had p7anned on using the garage during canstruction to store toois and equipment. Ne stated that he hoped to eventually incorporate the garage into part of the house that was to ~e built on that lot. M5P (Zepper-Foss) to approve the minor subdivision request of Cedar Bay Builders, 8247 Greenwood Orive, creating a south lot of 101.25' x 146' and a north iot basicaity of 101.25' x i46', with a 322' x 16.5' deep 7eg on the ncrth property line to the west. Approval sha11 be contingent with a 5' utility and drainage easement atong tha western proparty line of parcel B and 89.75' along the western line of parcel A, to a poinC where the util9ties cress the 16,5' leg and a. 10' easement where it crocses. 6 ayes 2 nayes Corrmission Members Macke6en and ~edor voted against the motion and Commission Member Mackeber~ staCed that he did not believe that a garage would be allowed on a piece _~ of prvperty without a residence. Commissiqn Member Fedor stated Lhat hc~ fe7t snme- thing better could be done with the 16.5'.