Laserfiche WebLink
January il, 1978 <br />MSD (Haake-Burmeister) ta recomnend ta the Council approvol aP the yrellminary <br />~ ptat that was introduced by.~inecrest Properties on danuary 11, 1978, wlth the <br />foliowing ravision, that th~ llistrict 2 traffic plan be incorporated into tRe <br />ptat tvith the exception of the Quincy Street connectlon. <br />A roilcall vote was taken: <br />Comnission Mem6er <br />Cottmission Member <br />Chairperson Naake <br />Comnission Member <br />Commission Member <br />Comnlssion Membar <br />Comnission Membeh <br />8lancherd - nay <br />Burmeister - aye <br />- aye <br />Glazer - nay <br />Fedor ~ nay <br />Mackeben - nay <br />Foss - abstein <br />Pnge 6 <br />4 n~yes, <br />2 ~yes, <br />1 abstain <br />Commission Member Fedor stated that he was concerned that P1r.Waste would not <br />want the assessments to his properC,y if the road were put thraugh. <br />Councilmember 8aumgartnar replied that Ae hed spoken with Mr.Waste and that Mr. <br />Waste had voiced hfs wlsh for a road through his praperty several times. OfficiaT <br />Rose added that Mr. Weste would be notlfled of the publlc hearing and would be <br />able to voice fifs opinion at.that time. Official Rose stated thaC a road system <br />deveToped by the City for a district wou]d in most cases plan better for totaT <br />~` deveiopnent, r•athet^ Lhan developer piecemeal work. <br />'.~ J <br />Commission Member Foss questioned if there would be n road coming aut by Jackson. ~ <br />Offloial Aose rept}ed that one connection was a must and that two woutd bs preferred ~ <br />for a better distrtbutlor of trefflc A.D.T. <br />Comnlssion Member Glazer steted that from past experience, he did not feat the City i <br />could expect new Highwaty 10 to :syphon off that much traffic and Lhat the area might <br />end up baing much more con~ested than was ptanaed on. <br />afficlal Rose r9pliad Chet two independent sources had check the.p7an. ene for the <br />developer end one Por ~he Cit,Y, and they had come very close to agreeing on the ~ <br />4rafiflc count and its impact. He a1so potnted out that the citizens themselves <br />would elso be benefiting fr~m the roads as thoy wou]d be using thern. ~ <br />MSD (Meckeban-Foss) to resortmertd to the Counci] approvat of thu pretiminary plat and re- ~ <br />znnings introduced by Plnecrest Properties on January 11, 1978, viith the foltow- . <br />ing revision, that ~he Dtstrlct 2 traffic plan be incorporated into the plat, r <br />~ A roiicail vote was takem ~ <br />Comnission Member 8lanchard - aye <br />~ Comnission Member Burmeister - 'nay ~ <br />. Chairperson Naake - nay ; <br />~ Comntssion Member G7azer - nay <br />; Comnlssion Member Fedor - nay i <br />± s Cortmission Member Mackeben - aye ~ <br />i ~ Lomnission Member foss - aye 4 nayes, ', <br />~ ~ 3 ayes , <br />