1978-04-12 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ppril 12, 1978 ~the plan and 422 required hy code, and also a 5' variance for paved area setback ~From the north property line a~d southeast lnterior corner, Mr. Ha11 stated that he would 11ke to thank the Pianning Cortniission and Officiai Rose and his StafF for the exceilent work they did on his pro~ect. MAJOR SUBDIVISION AND REZONING REQUEST OF GLEN KARLEN - 2809 COUNTY ROAD I Official Rase reported that the appllcant had originally requested to tocate self-service car wash be~siness on the property in question, which had been denied, and was now requesting a ma~or subdivision of three lots and rezoning from R-i to R-2 for two of the iots. Page 4 5 ayes Officiat Rose reported that Lhe propos2d subdivis9on sketch creates three lots, a11 canforming to area requirements For the proposed R-1 and R-[ znnings. Lot 1~ with a proposed R-2 zoning, only has a 90' frontage, while a 100' frontage is required. L~t 2, bein~ z corner lot with a proposed R~2 zoning meets the mrnimum 100' frontage requirements. Lot 3, with an R-1 zoning, has an 80' frontage, while an 85' frontage is req~ired. The applicant has requested the lot configuration to compliment h1s dup'ex deve7opment plan. This would give Lot 3 enough rooni fnr a L•ypical garage addition, even though t.he tot frontage is substandard.;~ and' also give Lot,2, a sorner lot, additional setback room. Chairpe~~son Haake asked what the required square footage was for duplex pro~erty. r~-~Officiai Rose repifed that it is12500 square feeL. Chairperson Haake questloned if ,l~ie applicant cauld move the lot lines and give the corner lot more room. Official ~~~Rose repiied that the app7lcant was trying to meet coAe requirements as much as possible and could realize at least 100' an the corner lot, with12500 square feet, if addltional space was taken from one of the other 1ots. Comnission Member 6urmeister stated that she would much rather see an 80' lot wtth a larger corner lot. Coim~issian Member Fass stated that he felt it would be 6etter ta have a iarger lot on the corner so that the house c1a1d be set back ta altow better visabitity for the drivers at the corner. Mr. Karlen asked if the Pianning Commission could approve M s skQtch plan iP he agreed to meet the requirements they set. Official kose replied that the Planning Comnission has been asked from time to time to approve sketch plans but preferred not to. Cha4rparson Naakr tooY, a consensus of Che P~anM ng Commission and stated that their consensus seemed to be that they felt the s~bdivision of two lots to face Silver Lake: Aoad cou7d ~o to R-2 and that they would 11ke to see Lot 1 be bruught closer to cade, a 100 lot rather than a 90' lat. She added that the R-1 lot could remain at 80', and that a 5' variance would he granted. MRJOR SUBDIVISION AND REtONING REqUEST Of KEN THOf<NTON - 8200 PLEA5AN7 VIEW DRYVE ~fPiciel Rose reported that the appiicant ha~ reyuested approval of a two block, 20 '~lot subdivision, includiog one outlot, and rezoning of 14 lots fwam 8-4 to R-1 and five lot.s fram B-4 to R-2, leaving nne outlot at B-4 status.