1978-05-10 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PROCEEOINGS OF TNE PIANNING COMMISSION ~ CITY Or" MOUNOS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA A regular meeting of the Mounds View P1anning Comnissian was cailed to order at 7:30 PM on May 10, 1978 at the Maunds View City Hall, 2401 Highwa~ 10, Maunds View, Minnesota 55112. Mem6ers Present: Chairperson Haake Comnission Member Fedor Comnisslon Member G1azer Comnission Member Burmeister A15o Present: Councilmember Baumgartner Bullding and Zoning Official Rose Members Absent: Comnission Member Blanchard Commission Mr.mher foss Chairperson Haake asked that the minutes of the April 26, 1978 meeting ba corrected to read on page 2, parayraph 5, 864 square feet rather than 860 square feet, on page 5, paYagraph 6, should be with s cunditSona7 use permit rather than wlthout, and page 6, paragrr.(sh 5 should be Edgewood rather than Knollwood. ~.MSP (F=dor-Burmeister) to approve the minutes of tfie Apsi1 26, 1978 meeting as icorreoted. 3 ayes ~/ 1 abstain Commission Member Glazer abstained fran the vote as he had not been present at the April 26 meeting. MAJOR SUBDTVISION AN~ REZONING REQUEST OF GLENN KARLEN - 2809 COUNTY ROAD I Official Ruse reported that the Planning Comnissior~ had reviewed a sketch of the prel{minary piat at the April 12 meeting and that the area is presently zoned R-1 and the applicant is proposing R-2 for the two lots that front S11ver Lake Road, which the Comprehensive Plan denotes a; single family. Official Rose stated that the proposed subdivlsion sketch creates three lots, all conforminu to area requirements far the proposed R-1 and R-2 zonings. Lot 1, with a proposed R-2 zoning, only has a 90 foot frontage, with a 190 faot frontage requlred Lot 3, being a corner lnt with a proposed R-2 zoning, meets Che minimun 100 foot frontage requlrements. Lot 2> with an R-1 zaning, has an f!0 foot frontage, wlth an 85 faot frontage reyuired. Official Rose reported that the applicant has requested this iot cunfiguration Lo cumpllment his dup7ex development plan. This wou7d give Lat 2 enouyh room for a typical garage addition, even though the lot frontage is substandard, and would a]so give Lot 3, a c~rner lot, sddittona7 setback room. ~fficial Rose added that tfie publ1c in,provements are availabla Por Che duplex devetopment but that the deveioper wuuld have to provide water servlce from Co. Rd. Por Lot 1. An additional 5' easement would 6e required along Silver l.ake Road. !~,,Ghairperson Haake stated that she would prefer seeing Lot 1 at 95 feet rather than 90 feet. Official Rose repliad that the appllcanC felt it would b2 bettar to have more frontage~ on Lot 3 to keep :he house off the corner, anQ t~at if th fror~t~qe of lct 1~ was 100', the appllcant wouid go under the area requ rements for 10