My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1978-05-24 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
1978-05-24 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 4:18:07 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:22:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
p <br />~., <br />~ PROCEEDIN~S Of THE PLANNING COMMIS510N <br />' CITY OF MOUNOS VIEW <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br />A regular meeting of the Mounds View Pianning Cortmisslon was calied to order et <br />7:30 PM on May 24, 1978 at the Mounds View City Na11, 2401 Nighway 10, Mounds <br />View, Minnesota 66112. <br />Members Present: <br />Ghairperson Haake <br />Comntssion Member Fedor <br />Garrnission Member Glazer <br />Commi:ston Member Bu>meister <br />Carmission Member 8lanchard <br />Cwrmission Menber Foss <br />Comnisslon Member quan <br />Also Presentc <br />Building and Zohing Official Rose <br />Chalrperson Haake ±ntroduced newly appointed Comnission MemSer Quan to the members <br />of the Pianning Commission. <br />Chairp~rson Haake stated the minutes of the May 10, 1978 meeting wore approved <br />,~as read. <br />i~,~ <br />MqJOR SUBOIVISION AND REZONING REQU@ST OF GLEN KARLEY - 2809 COUNTY ROAD I <br />MSP (Giazer-burmeister} to remove thts item from the table. 7 eyes <br />Official Rose reported thet at the last maeting the question came up of where the <br />private services were for Lot 2, and the applicant has since drawn it on his preliminary <br />p1at. The Plan~inq Commission also requested that the ~pplicant t y t m ke Lot t come <br />as close as possib7e to a code conforming 'ot, ;~ith 100 frontage ~or ~up~ex <br />construction. <br />Official Rose reported that the applicant has found it moPe pract9cal not to change <br />the frontages along Silver Lake Raad, due to the locatton of the prlvate service. <br />The existing lot configuratior. wiit aliow the app1lcnnt to build both R-2 lots <br />without the need of a setback variance. ~fficial Rcse added that additional utility <br />would not be neces>ary as the Cit,y pians to tnstall a water main aloug the Silver <br />Lake Road frontage. <br />Comnission Member Burmeister asked how far the sewer 11ne was from the proposad <br />building. OPi'iciaT Rose replied that 1t was 5' and that with the depth of tfie <br />proposed foundatlan and the depth of the 71ne, there should be no probiem. <br />Bob Helsetfi, a representative of the Task Force asked how far the duplex would be <br />_ from the read and 9f thepe would be ample parking. Chairperson Haaice repited that <br />~~jt will be 45' froR County Road I and 35' from Silver Lake Road and that there <br />~,NOUId be amp7e parking. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.