Laserfiche WebLink
~ Octdber 25, 1978 <br />Paga 2 <br />~-~pmmieel~n Membot Quan aeked if ChaYe were problem areae, OE£i~iel Roae <br />:pli~d that he had epoken Co tli~ Police Chief and there r~ere no problem <br />..reea more typical than othere in tha City. <br />Commiseion Member Burmeieter aaked how much iaput NSP hae into atireet <br />lighting. Official Rose replied th~k Chey are mora than willing to put <br />up a etreet Iight iE ehere ie s pole in alresdy. H~ added that NSP ie <br />revieing their figures ta give .a summary oE the coete involved. <br />Connaisalon Dtember Blanchard etated that several yeare ago NSP did a eurvey <br />of the CiCy and pro,jected tha atreet lighting requirementa. Official Rose <br />replied that he would check with NSP but there was no indication of any <br />aurvey in the City's fiJ.ee. <br />Commiaeion Member Burmeieter staCed that with aome oE the new additione <br />~oing in in the City, there were long Ulocke that might need ndditional <br />lighting on them. <br />Chairpereon Haake atated ehe f.elt a priority syeL•em ehould be eatabliehed, <br />siwilar to the one Fridley nses, with priority being placed on intereectione, <br />eharp curves, dead ends and cul-de-eaco, long blocks and vandalized areas. <br />Commission•Member Fose aaked if the City could select the atyle of light <br />fixCUre to go ia, Official Rose replied tha~ about the only input the <br />City hae is to tell NSP how long to make the arm on the fixt;ure. <br />i~mmisaion Member Fedor etated he liked the priorities rridley uaes and <br />~..at ha fclt they =hould also add echools to thst pricrt.tp list, p,+iC21 <br />approximately a 400' minimum between fixtures. Commiaeion rt~mber BurmeleCer <br />added thaC she felt a petitiott. should etill. be requ±red for the, lights. <br />Commiesion Member Fedor auggested that the City conduct a aurvey after a <br />petition ie received and if it meets the 400' mirimnm, ehen aee it it <br />meeta the list of priorities. <br />MSP (puan-Haake) to make a reco~endation to Staff that the criteria for tite <br />atreet lightiag ordinance include having s minimum of 400' between 1lghta, <br />a atudy be done only after a petition ie received for those affected, a <br />priority syaCem be set up to include lntersections, eharp curvee, de~d <br />enda and cul-de-aace, lang blocke, vandalized areas and areae of public <br />concern and safety. 7Che ordinance ehoal.d take into account the wattage, <br />that the etreet light be appropriate and cosL• effective f.or the areu. 7 ayes <br />Commieaion Member Foae atated he felt ehey ehould also allow orne~nental <br />sighting, wir,h the coat to be shar~d by the property ownere. <br />Co¢m~iseion Member Glazer atated he did not feel a priority eystem ahould <br />be eet bat ratt~er give the prtoritiea au examplea u~on which requesta could <br />be based. He added that he did not want to see the. prlorities in any order. <br />MJP (Glezer-Burmeister) to smend Lhe previoue motion tp say guideiines <br />• ~ther thaa pzioritiea. 7 ayes <br />icy~„/ <br />