Laserfiche WebLink
PAOCEEDIN48 OF TNE PLANNIN~ COMMI88ION <br />~ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br />RAMBEY COUNTY, 6fINNE80TA <br />A ragular maetix~ of the Mounde View Planning Commieeion wae oell~d <br />to nrde: by Chairpereon HaRke at 7i30 PM on November .:4, 1970 at the <br />Mounde View City Hell, 2401 Highway 10, Mounde View, Minnesota 55112. <br />Members preeent~ <br />Chaixpereon Haake <br />Commieaion Member Hlanchard <br />Cemm3ssion Memher P!±rmeiater <br />Comrttieaion Member Fedor <br />Commi.eeion Member. Foee <br />Commiesian Member Glazer <br />Commieeion Member puan <br />Aleo Preeehts <br />Planning Teohnioian Kampel <br />J <br />MSP ([~aake-BUrmeister) to appr~ve the mi.nutes of the Nnvember B, <br />1970 meeting as read. 7 eyee <br />~ 1 Mr. Kampel reported that the appliaant hae requeated a building <br />''~"~ germit to aonatruat a three uni,t multiple £amily dwelling at <br />7824 Etigewood Drive. <br />Planning coneidexations includa thati both the exiacing zoning nnd <br />Comprehetteive Plan danote R-3 mellum density residential ueaye. <br />The lot con~orme to minimum area r6quirements and the proposed triplex <br />meote the minimum building aetback requirementa. Water, eanitary <br />eewer and atorm sewer eervices are 'available to the lot. All <br />drainage should.be directed toward Edgewood Drive. Conaret~ ourb <br />and gutter are required at drivewsy,and off-stseet parkinq locaeions. <br />At the time ef application, this triplex wae being aonsidered under <br />townhouee developme:,t, with a r.equiremant of eix non-driveway, <br />off-etreet parkinq Ap~oes. Just prior to the meeting, StaPf 81e- <br />oovered that- tho pac~paeea triplex d1d nnt meet townhouee requiremente, <br />ns each individual unit mubL be owner occupie3. In this cNee, only <br />one, if any, of the unite will be owner ocoupied--the r~at wiil he <br />rented. The triplex muat now be conaidered a multip~e tamily ~lwelling, <br />roquiring ef~ht o£f-etreat parking spacae. The plea aoea no~ maet <br />the maximum of one curb cu*_ requirement far each 125 Eeet af etreet <br />frantage. A variance ie zequired for allowance of two curb ruta. <br />Mr. Kampbl recommended a revision of the ai~e plnn layout to aacom- <br />modate eii ufi-atroot,pa=kinq area fnr e minimum of eix rere prior to <br />, approval, and hardehi.p reasoning Eflr the numbez of curb auts i! <br />(,~ a reaammandation of approval ie giver~. <br />