Laserfiche WebLink
December 13, 1978 <br />Paga 6 <br />~""~Commission Member Burmetoter aeked what the Spring Lgke Park property wae <br />zonad, Off~cinl Roae replied that it wae commercia2, He edded t~;at he <br />felt Spring Lake Park would require wlialever bueinese wenC in to put in <br />adequate ecraening. <br />Mr. Damm etated that he could turn the building on the lot and come to <br />withitt 3' of being lagal Uut that it would require mora Chan a right <br />angla for turning into the driveway. <br />MSP (Haake-Glazer) i.o grant the variance of 5' for the pr~posed duplex <br />d~velopment at 8230 Plec~aant View Drive for the rear yard setback, the <br />reaeon bein~ that they are deal3ng with a txinngular ehaped lot and <br />thnt Che 30 setback in front i.s more deoireable to maintain. 6 ayea <br />VARIANCE REpUEST OF RODNEY DAhIl~i - 8230 AI3D 8225 PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE <br />I Official Rose reported that the applicant has requeated to have two cuxb <br />' cuts each at the proposed duplex developmenCa at 8225 and 8230 Ple~~sant <br />View llrive and thAt Mounde View code allowa only on~ curb cut per <br />propezty. He edded that two curb cute have been allowed in the past and <br />that Staff h~d conducted a ourvey u£ several othei communf.ties and found <br />that they a11ow ewo curb cuts for duplex developmenta. Ae added Chat <br />the applicant has p~+ovided a aurveyor's certificate ahowing L-he location <br />and layout oP the proposed etructure, driveways and curb eute. He also <br />~'~c~tated that Pleasant f,'iew Drive io a reeidential, non-collector atreet whicti <br />i ;is not heavily travelled. <br />~~ <br />~ Officlal Rosa recoumiended that the Planning Commiaeion consider a~,ossible <br />( ordinence change ellowing two curb cues where eech curb cut dnes not <br />exceed 12 feet ar allow one curb cut maximum 30' in width. <br />~ <br />Mr. Da~ stated he would like to put in two 16' curb cute. He sCated that <br />from hie experience he hxd £ound with narrow drivewavs people back out <br />over the grase and it soon becomes a muddy apot at t~ie end of the driveway. <br />Offi~ial Rose recoimnended that Mr. Damm put :n a 3' radiuu at the end oP <br />each drive. <br />Commiseiom Member Burmeiater asked how the no mans land raould be maitttained. <br />Offi.cial Roae suggested thRt rocks ard shrubbery be put in. 0£.ficl.al Roae <br />drew a sketch oE the propored development and showed how the driveways <br />could be put in, to meet the 30' width requirement, ueing the 3' radiua to <br />increase it at L•he end. <br />~SSP (Haake-Burmeiater) to grant a variance to the exiating curb cut ordi- <br />nance that eays the width a£ the dziveway ehould not exceed 22'. The <br />variance is to grant,Mr. Damm an add±tional 8', which will allow a 30' <br />curU euc a~ che propercy nt tf2Y5 Pleasant View Dtive aiad ti230 Fl~aasat <br />View Drive, for the pzopoaed R-2 develonment, to accomodate adequate <br />driveway width to the two oarages in the development, 6 ayes <br />~~~Chairperson Raake asked that Official Rose pre~,are an ordinancE change <br />for the next Plannin~ Commisaion meet3ng, incorpora~ing the changee the <br />Planning Commiaeinn would like ta see, <br />