1979-03-28 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

March 28, 1979 PaEe 5 ommieaion Member Goebel xecomutettd-ad thIIt elie ep~+lieapte uss a gravel ~as under concrete with ~ratinge to a1Low the water to run down. .~r. Sudzynsk3, xaplied that Chey would coneider them buC would also have Co coneider the poseihility of their caving in. Mx~. Budzynaki etated that they had been check3ng with other office areae tu ane what their parking requiremente were and they had discov~red thst Mounde View requires many m~}re epacea than the ~ther cities thay had checked. He also pointed out thaC leas parking o~ould allow more sur£aca area, and L•hat Cheir original pZan had call.ed for 109 parking epacee, witl~ much mor.e green area but that ehey had had to change it to maet the 138 ~paces xequired by Mouada View aode. t4r, Mathern asked what the Planning Commission would like to sea them do with regard to drainage. Co~niasion Member 8oebel replied that he would like to see them tnke care of 40-50% of the run-oEf without going off the property. !ie also recommended that the npglicant plan on k~eeping 75-80% of the wate: from 1" of 2" raine within 3 to 4 honre on elte, or E" over 24 houre, taking 60%. Aeting Chairperson Fador stated he would like to table the diacuNeiou until the City can contact an engineer foz his reco~rmoendation. Officiul Roee added that he would prefer thst the City hir.e an engineer, with the developer £ront-ending the coet. ,,.~nuncilmember F'crslund alsu rer_ommen~ed ~ ,or the coet of having an engineer atudy `./ AcCing Chairperson Fedor atated that the know what to recomwectd to ehe applicant and that they would like an engineer to that piece of land to hold, and give the for his servicea. that r.he applicaut be reeponsibie the plan and make a recommendstion. Planning Co~aiseion did not yet for him to go Co an enginaer wtth, etate what would be reaaonabZe for applicant an estimate oP the coat Mr. Mathern atated that they would be wllling to aooperate with whatever engineer tha Cicy would specify to get the pro~ect moving. MSP {Goebel-Quan) to table iesue until the applicaat reports back to the Planning Comniesion with information on draiztage. i ayee Commisaion Member Goebel asked that it be clarified thaC Staff and the Planning Commiseion will estimat'e the coat oE deriving the data required regarding retention of water and drainage for the prog:rty, and that the applicant ie expeoted ta paq for it, as lon~ ar~ they feol the eetimate ie reaeottable, and they wi~l cooperate if the City chooaea Che engineer. '3ELECTION OF PLANNING CON"uULTANT 24SP (Quen-Goebs~l) to tablc the selection oi a planning c~usultant. ? s,a~ i~VIOUS GITSC COUNCIL ACTIONS Counciimember Forelund regc~xted thek the City Counc~l hed tabled tne aation on lot subdivis3ons st ttieir previoue meeting, She ~leo xeported