Laserfiche WebLink
Mo~~ndn Vf_ny pl~nntng Comminelon <br />Page 5 <br />July 3~ 1475 <br />Commieeion Member Ooebel aeked ebout the msinCenanae prograoi apd expreeaod <br />conenrn about rgpid deterioration. McKeana etatad many unice would bu <br />Cownhousea and would havc Go be conetrucCad to Mn11FA and HUD quelity re- <br />~quiramaate. They vill coet £rom $30~000-35,Otl0 aud aould be eubJec2 to <br />F eevere guideliaes of conecruction. <br />HcKanna etatad 46 units of thia type elready exieC in Mouade Yiew i¢ <br />varioue epartment compiaxee. Pag Mountin ataCed her concern thaee reeLdente <br />maq prefer baing integratad into other complaxee than in a"xeservntion" <br />Cype houeing. <br />Commie~lon Member Fedor atatad it eo~nded good ae it ie helpful for people <br />aeeding it, but he had a problem with it from a tex viewpoi.nt. <br />Commieaion Membar 6laaec etated he t~ad e problem regarding timiag aince <br />Mou¢ds View doae not currearly have a land uee p1an. Ne was coacerned thnt <br />aeighboring cealde¢te ehould have a chance to commant 6efore tha Ctty <br />beaomea commitCed r.o thle projact. <br />MSP (Glazer/llaake) to tsbla this item uneil such time ao we can ravisw <br />tha houeing plen with the pianning conealtane, Midweat P2aaning. <br />6 ayee <br />AiCHGY LO AND PL6ASANT VIBH DRIVE SIGN~I,IZATIUN <br />OfF3cia1 Roae explained thie matter had baea reviawe3 a number of moaehe <br />ago. Subsequent to our £eadback, tha Dept. of Traacportation hae come up <br />with anothet propoeal. making khe ma~ority of tha improvement in Spri¢g Lake <br />Perk, theraby protecting Pleaeant VSew Dr. from abnormal impac[ uith no <br />nEed tu eliminata tha neatby duplexae ne in the other proposal. <br />~~ Mr. 8vaa Crean~ MnDOT, and Joel &aCZ rapreeented MnDOT. Mr. Grean explained <br />the propoeal wonld aloee,the madia¢ cut and accesa cut and relocate to <br />tha other elde oP &wy. 10, raruuting eruELtc ~u ti~e aigurllzau Lnta~scctl.cn. <br />Tha exie:ing situntio¢ with Cha iataraeoelon c2oee to Che interchange <br />creates a tra£fic eafaty hazerd. <br />Commiseion Member Glazar aeked what Spring Lake Pk's commentx ware. Mr. <br />Green atated they were geaerally ia favor and thought they would diecuee <br />i[ at thnir Council meeting this week. <br />MSP (Haeke/Goebel) to racommand to Council they accept thie proposed <br />eignalization that has 6ean presented at Hwy 1.0 aad Pleaeant VSew Dr. <br />6 ayee <br />DEIS FOR NEW TRUNK NIGHIJAX 10 <br />Official Roae indicatad the matter hed arisen by a cieizen'at the reoent <br />Couucil meeting. The reeidanC asked Council to make a resolution on :he <br />Hwy 30 iasue snd Council dtd not wlah to comp.ly. <br />Peg Mountio atated aha hsd 6aen eepecially involvad in the iesue and had <br />petitioned reeidents to datermine thelr feelinga on 3 alteruativas: no <br />build, oostharn corrf.dor, oz up~rade pzeeent 10. She et~tnd ttra realdanC <br />in quneCion is oppusc3 Ca norther cor.ridor and se.aln "uo build° Le a <br />~viable alternative, Other resideate favor the northarn carridor withuut <br />a Red Oak intarchaage, aad the ganeral £eeling ie against upgrading presenC <br />