Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MOUNDS VSEW PLANNIN6 COMMI38ION Reguler Meetinq <br />Pege_2_____ ___ <br />°_~-__-__~__-___~_______________'^ _____ FebruarY_6t^1980 <br />~ <br />Commiseion Membor Fedor l~ft tho maeting <br />at thi~ time (11s15 P.M.) <br />Planning Commiaeion diecueeed Resolution 5. RBSOLUTION #1062 <br />No. 1062 for their input to the Counail. <br />Haake moved to reaommend to the Council the <br />addiriott oE A@, ae followe, in the "NOW, <br />THEREFORE, BE TT RE9QLVED" eeclion of <br />~ Rqeolution 11062: " <br />~ 5. We ere oppoaed to the construction <br />oE an iateraection in alaine of <br />New Nighoray 10 between 35W and <br />Highway 65. <br />Goebel eeconded tha motion. <br />The motion aarried. 6 syes <br />0 naye <br />Glazer moved to recommend to the Counail the <br />addition o£ $6, ae fo].2owa, in the "NOW, <br />THEREFOTtE, BE ST RE90LVED10 eaction oE <br />~\ <br />f , Reerolution M1062~ <br />~"'~ 6. Vle are opposed to the updating <br />of Mounds View north/e~uth streete ' <br />north oF existing Highway 10. <br />Gosbel eeconded the motion. <br />The motion carried. ~~ 6 ayee <br />0 nays <br />Haeke moved to recammend to the Council ~• <br />epprqval oP Reeolution Nq. 1062 with the <br />additione of the two previoue'mptions, i.e., <br />iteme N5 and N6. The motion wae seconded <br />by Glazer. <br />The motlon carr3.ed. 6 ayes <br />0 naye <br /> 6. COUNCIL MEMHER <br />Planning Commieeion reviewed the memo from ROWLEY'S MEMO 1/29/d0 <br />Counail Member Judy Rowley dated 1/29/80 <br />regarding poeeible etorm watar goals. <br />~ Goelael mnved to inEorm the Council that the <br />~•~~ Plenning Commiaeion hae reviewed Council Member <br />~ <br />, / Row2ey'a memo dated 1/29/80 with regar8 tc <br />1`~.~ atorn: water goals anfl feale that the queetiona <br />addreased in the memo are addressed in their <br />p Eorthcoming report entitled "Recommendations <br />i <br />~ <br />~ <br />Y <br />m~,.,: . - . . , , <br />